Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apocalypse Soon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 10:28 PM
Original message
Apocalypse Soon
I apologize if this has been posted before.

Link: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?
story_id=2829

Snip: <Robert McNamara is worried. He knows how close we've come. His
counsel helped the Kennedy administration avert nuclear catastrophe
during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Today, he believes the United
States must no longer rely on nuclear weapons as a foreign-policy
tool. To do so is immoral, illegal, and dreadfully dangerous.


It is time—well past time, in my view—for the United States to cease
its Cold War-style reliance on nuclear weapons as a foreign-policy
tool. At the risk of appearing simplistic and provocative, I would
characterize current U.S. nuclear weapons policy as immoral,
illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous. The risk
of an accidental or inadvertent nuclear launch is unacceptably high.
Far from reducing these risks, the Bush administration has signaled
that it is committed to keeping the U.S. nuclear arsenal as a
mainstay of its military power—a commitment that is simultaneously
eroding the international norms that have limited the spread of
nuclear weapons and fissile materials for 50 years. Much of the
current U.S. nuclear policy has been in place since before I was
secretary of defense, and it has only grown more dangerous and
diplomatically destructive in the intervening years. >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robeysays Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. that also what i belive,
nuclear warheads are pointless and to expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But
they certainly line the pockets of those defense contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC