Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fired for being married.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:13 AM
Original message
Fired for being married.
I just got off the phone with a friend of mine in the Buffalo area who was just fired because the employer found out that he and his wife both worked there. They had only worked there for one day... until the employer found out they were a married couple.

The excuse the employer gave was that 'if one calls in sick - they both do'.

The place is Medco in Buffalo.

Anyone else see bullshit here?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. My company...
has anti-nepotism rules. Once one of the engineers married a tech writer and one of them had to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. They fired both of them.
Although I do understand there can be problems, I don't see why they had to let them both go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yeah, that sounds like bs.
What type of company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. They fill medical supply orders...
It's a phonebank.

Basically cubicles and operators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. True, however...
As far as I know, most of those rules apply to managment(salaried) relationships with hourly employees. In other words, you can't date the boss, or marry them, or be married to them. Neither can you be a relative of a boss, through marriage or blood. Usually employees do not really care if two hourly employees are dating or married, as long as one doesn't have the power to give a raise to said person, or fire them. As far as I know this applies to most companies, thought others may have more draconian rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well if it's true they both call in sick together...
Yeah, there's a good case that they're probably just playing hookie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. they had only worked there for one day
the statement of absenses was the company's excuse to for their policy (ie they are making the presupposition that this would happen - but not based on any behavior of either of the couple.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's not all that uncommon.
I've worked several places where there were rules against spouses. Too many entanglements and employers just don't want to have to deal with that kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yes, I can see that one has to leave but both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. co. may be worried about gender discrimination claims
if they fire the man but not the woman, or vice versa. So they take the CYA route of saying both must leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. An upside for us gay couples is that we can't marry and those rules
don't apply to us :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. LOL! always a silver lining eh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Gotta look on the upside.... Like my friend who quit his job to go to
school full time. He doesn't have to claim his partner's income which supports him fully because they are not married. He qualifies for grants to pay for all of school. Maybe it is cheating a little bit, but that is what theyget for being hateful bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. He he he he... well isn't that an interesting angle?
"We must put a stop to homoseksuals abusing the system by living together! They must be compelled to register as partners, or encouraged to marry!" Rep. Mort Fundie, (R)-Redstate, Anymonth 2008.

They can either allow marriage or spend gawdawful amounts of money harassing roommates/housemates all over the country.

This could be fun to make an issue of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Well, the 1 or 2 benefits of NOT being married are far outweighed by the
1200 or so benefits of being married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I wouldn't suggest they are, but...
If we bring the example of your friend's arrangement to the attention of the right fiscal conservatives, they might well lead the fight for gay marriage. It would amuse me to no end to see homophobic Rethugs fighting for gay marriage in order to curb the rising tide of 'Welfare Queers'.

Either that or watching them go on costly witch hunts and making fools of themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Stupid rule
But not illegal. Working with a spouce is a bad idea anyways but hey, why limit a person's right to marry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, they could have been fired for lying on their applications.
If the company has a policy against spouses working together, and this couple omitted or falsified their marital status on their employment applications, the lie is sufficient reason for dismissal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Check one of the following boxes;
<> married

<> single

<> married to another employee working for this company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Good one!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Try to find out whether it is a violation of state or federal law
I would contact the Dept. of Labor in the State to ask for help. Perhaps start with the consumers aid - often part of the state DA office.

Also contact your state representative for assistance in who is the best dept to handle this.

As you said - it is understandable if one has to leave, but both?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Is it an at-will state?
Yeah, it is bullshit, but there may not be anything they can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I believe New York is 'employment-at-will'.
So, yeah - they're S.O.L.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. It is not an unknown practice
I have heard of many companies having the same policy, but typically they just tell one of them to resign.

I married my hubby while we worked for the same company and the VP told me that technically one of us should not be there but since we worked in different departments he wasn't going to exercise that option.

I quit two years later and then they worried my hubby would follow. He did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. ?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Did it ask in the job application & was it in the employee handbook?
AND had the employee had a chance to read the handbook AND sign off on something saying that they read the handbook.

When I was in Human Resources - that's what we usually looked at.

Although - normally for the first three months/probationary period a employee can be fired for pretty much no reason. If someone lied on their application or to management - that could be grounds for termination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Most restaurants can fire you for any reason.
Edited on Thu May-12-05 12:44 PM by RandomKoolzip
I don't know about any one else's line of work, but the food service places I've worked for can terminate you at any time, for any reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. restaurants are a different thing.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. Fairly common
Although immediate dismissal isn't usually the first remedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debbi801 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. When I worked for MCI, this was the policy...
if two people who worked there decided to get married, one of them would have to quit the company. It may be that they fired both of them for not disclosing that they were married. :shrug:

Where I work now, the only rule is that one spouse cannot directly manage the other. We have a lot of married couples in my company.

Debbi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. And things work Ok there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debbi801 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Surprisingly, yes....
You never see both the husband and wife calling out sick at the same time, you don't see them congregating at each other's desks, etc.

I would imagine it would be harder to schedule vacation time, but I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC