maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 12:44 AM
Original message |
Whats Howard Dean saying about ALL the dems voting in Real ID? |
|
Is he supporting their vote or condemning it?
|
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I'll bet the silence is, well... |
|
...resounding. Watch the ranks close.
|
Justitia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
2. "Dean Calls on Bush to Stand Up to Extremists and Oppose Real ID" |
|
http://www.democrats.org/hispanic/news/200504280003.htmlHis position seems pretty straightforward and clear cut to me.
|
lala_rawraw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Sorry, but did he and everyone else miss Bush's memo |
|
To Congress about his staunch support for Real ID?
Hello, can we please stop with paper filing and just say the word that needs to be said?
"Impeachment" or in this case "Chimpeachment"
|
w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. You can say Impeachment all you want... |
|
...with the GOP in charge of all both Houses of Congress, the White House and the majority of the judicial appointments, Bush could rape a dead boy on live TV, and he'd still not get impeached.
|
w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
...that's not enough. Why doesn't Dean throw himself in front of Bush's motorcade? He would if he were serious. He's just another Dem sellout. </sarcasm>
|
wellst0nev0ter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Guess Dems Don't Want To Have To Explain |
|
Why they refused to support the troop :eyes:
seriously, someone try to explain in three words or less why you'd vote against an $82 billion dollar legislation for the soldiers.
|
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-12-05 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Edited on Thu May-12-05 02:19 AM by mike_c
That meets your three words criteria, but the longer answer is that the occupation of Iraq is a criminal enterprise and every congressional vote in support of it-- or the "troops" conducting it-- abbets an ongoing crime against humanity. I'm not using those terms lightly, either. The invasion and occupation of Iraq is a crime against humanity under the U.N. Charter and the Nuremburg decisions, both of which were drafted and affirmed under the direction the the United States, and they have violated many of the most fundamental provisions of the Geneva Conventions. Every dime that Congress appropriates in support of that enterprise is a crime.
I'd vote against that $82 billion special appropriations bill in a skinny minute.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message |