Anyone else see the tie between Chalabi and Galloway as cause to impeach?

[Roland99]

The links between Chalabi and Galloway and the Oil-for-Food scandal are now being made clear.

We also know Chalabi was the key to providing the false intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq.

We also know the PNAC neocons in the administration were behind bringing Chalabi back into the fold.

We also know the PNAC neocons in the administration are tied to AIPAC and AIPAC was behind hounding Galloway (http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/051305Madsen/051305madsen.html)

We also know that AIPAC has been spying for Israel from within the Pentagon.



What else is needed to just finally connect the dots for the American public and the world at large?? This is our smoking gun.

All we need is the goddamned MEDIA to start telling the damn story!!!



Damn this pisses me off!! It's not the crime, it's the COVER-UP! That's what brought down Nixon and it's what will bring down this administration is the MEDIA (and the Democrats, too), finally grow some balls and STICK IT TO THEM!! The information is RIGHT THERE!!

[Jacobin]

1. There is no lack of "cause" to impeach

There is the problem that republicans won't do it. They control both Senate and House.

And there are too many dems who are complicit in the IraqNam debacle, who wouldn't want their complicity discussed in an impeachment proceeding.

[Avalux]

2. They key is with the American people -

if the media would report the truth, the American public would start opening their eyes, realizing they've been lied to and start pressuring their Senators and Representatives (repugs want to be reelected no matter what). Impeachment could happen if the people rise up and demand it.

[spooked911]

3. More and more people are realizing what is going on but the Bush admin

is bullying the media into submisison and the Republicans simply won't go after Bush since he is one of their own. It's a bad bad situation.

The only hope I see is if the dems can win the House in 2006 and start impeachment proceedings. The dems needs to start cranking up their message now.

[Avalux]

7. We need fair elections too

no hope of winning in 2006 if voting isn't verifiable. At this point, I think the republicans believe they'll never lose another election.

[FreedomAngel82]

4. I wonder though

if enough people pressure republican Congressmen and Senator's if they would do it? They are obviously being controlled by Karl Rove and Cheney and they'd never do that because they know they'd lose their base who are major Bush supporters unless they are changing their minds. The whole oil-for-food scandal I believe was made to make the UN uncrediable so Bush can use this to make them uncrediable on Iraq. Who would people believe? Bush who they think is looking out for them or the UN who they claimed to steal oil from and keep people starving?

[Avalux]

6. The media must take a stand -

the media (TV news) have the ability to influence people and it's time they start doing it the right way. Senators and Congressmen want to stay in office, above all else. If their constituents start complaining and appear to be changing their minds, they'll abandon Bush in a heartbeat. I think it could happen.

[Roland99]

5. I submit the following from the Declaration of Independence

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security -- Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

[yurbud]

8. buzh could eat children on White House lawn and not get impeached

[cestpaspossible]

9. Call me ignorant but

The links between Chalabi and Galloway and the Oil-for-Food scandal are now being made clear.

Could you make them clear to me? Thanks in advance

[Roland99]

11. Read this article and then watch these videos:

Galloway hounded by AIPAC cell within U.S. Congress; Bolton tied to same cell
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/051305Madsen/051305madsen.html


http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news_web/video/9012da68000cfe0/nb/09012da68000d146_nb_16x9.asx

http://www.edwardsdavid.com/BushVideos/msnbc_uk_galloway_blisters_us_on_iraq_050517-01.rm

[cestpaspossible]

16. thanks nt

[Independent_Liberal]

10. We're going to legally force them to impeach. How might you ask?

www.wallacevbushlawsuit.com

We're going to put a 50 state legal stranglehold on the government. All members of Congress will be forced to comply upon state court order. Anybody who doesn't comply will be booted out of office upon public complaint. It's a recall process.

Check this out: www.recallthecongress.com

[Roland99]

13. Is that that lawyer who was going to sue * over 9/11?

[Independent_Liberal]

15. No, that was somebody else.

You're probably thinking of Stanley Hilton. I think his lawsuit got sabotaged.

This guy, Doug Wallace, is suing Bush, Cheney, et al, over the Iraq war and the PNAC.

He said all Americans can assist him in court ordered dismantling of the PNAC and get legal control over the federal government.

Organizations need set up in 50 states.

[Roland99]

18. Ah...yeah....that was him.

Thanks for the info. I'll look it over tonight!

[goodhue]

12. there are many causes, too few votes

[Roland99]

14. What I'm thinking is this ties SO MUCH stuff together now that if...

the media would only cover it and cover it well and long, this administration would have no choice but to resign.

[UdoKier]

17. LOL. You don't expect the "media" to suddenly become journalists do you?

They have spent the last 20 years or so morphing into the corporate lackeys they have become. They WILL NOT go against the BFEE. The BFEE is their prime benefactor. They are paid very well to spin everything the BFEE's way. What's in it for them if they suddenly start reporting the news?