Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Connection between Iraq war and "the nuclear option": Lust for Absolutism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 10:16 AM
Original message
Connection between Iraq war and "the nuclear option": Lust for Absolutism
The underlying reason for the war in Iraq, as the Downing Street memo makes excrutiatingly clear, is that Bush wanted to have it. It had nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction. Nothing to do with the murder of Iraqi people by its own government. Nothing to do with alleged violations of international law. The only "reasons" for the war, if appetites can be dignified with such a label, lay inside the Bush boy's pea brain.

Similarly, the Republicans, who threw every obstacle in the path of Clinton's nominees to the federal bench, denying 67 from even getting a "fair hearing" and "the straight up and down vote these fine men and women deserve," now expect that every last choice of Bush be given that chance--though it's only 10(TEN!!! Compared to 67!!!) who haven't been able to clear the committee.

What is the connection, besides pigheadedness? Isn't it that the Republicans are trying to create the conditions for a sort of absolute monarchy? They don't even seem to care what the people think. Now that they're in power, they want total control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's almost as if
there was a meeting at some point after the 2000 election, and someone (probably Cheney) said, "Alright, now's our chance...is everyone ready?"
counting on Democrats to be half-asleep.

They were right. Or maybe half-right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, the Council on National Policy (Viguerie's brainchild)
has been plotting this takeover for years. This is the same organization that locked its doors and refused to allow a transcript of Bush's remarks to it in 1999 to be released to the media. Their goal has always been to remake the US into a doctrinaire fundamentalist Christian society. They have been drooling about getting their hands on the courts for thirty years--or longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are they calling the shots
or the PNAC, or both?

http://watch.pair.com/cnp.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. They have slightly different agendas, but their objectives meld
CNP wants to bring on the apocalypse; PNAC wants to reform the Middle East into a Wal-Mart and Israel friendly wonderland. They're both willing to use tactical nuclear weapons to achieve their objectives.

But CNP also wants theocracy. PNAC is willing to look the other way if they can just use the GOP's control of the military to project a new American century into the foreseeable future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Fits in nicely with the religious right's push for moral absolutism
and tight social control. Coincidence? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC