Craig3410
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:31 PM
Original message |
Is * the most divisive president ever? |
|
Let's face it; most of us think he is a brain-damaged crack addict who use d his daddy's powers to cheat his way through life (which is true) and his followers as mindless hypocritical sheep that wouldn't see evil if it was in bed sleeping with their wives.
Conservatives think of us as un-american commies who hate america and would like to see us dead.
So?
|
rndmprsn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. He's have to be caught with beasts of burden in a compromising position |
|
Edited on Sun Jun-19-05 09:34 PM by cynatnite
while shooting up heroin before they get it. Even then I'm not sure if they'd believe it.
They'd probably need more proof :sarcasm:
|
Bouncy Ball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. I think about 10% of his current supporters would still support him if |
|
he were shown live on all TV stations, standing on the White House lawn in nothing but a pink tutu eating toddler fingers and then having an all-male orgy.
They'd say he was set up, drugged and coerced into doing it! LOL!
The funny thing is, the more he fucks up, the more they have to make arguments that make him sound totally inept.
Witness rush limpballs saying if we are hit in a terrorist attack again, that it would not be the fault of bush and the party in power, but a handful of Democratic congress critters, three periodicals and Amnesty International. Apparently that's all it takes to totally thwart the party in power and bush!
:rofl:
|
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yep, us libruls and clinton luvrs wuld get blamed n/t |
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He's a uniter, not a divider. Most of the world hates him. n/t |
Ladyhawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. No, Lincoln was the most divisive president ever. n/t |
unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. i would say he was the most divisive president-ELECT ever |
|
given that the secessions began before he took office.
he might have been the most divisive president, but the south didn't give him the chance.
|
Yupster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
You can't get much more divisive than dividing the country into two halfs that fought each other until 600,00 were dead.
I'd say Lincoln without even a thought.
I'd also give Lincoln the bumbles the country into war award which Bush is apparently trying to immitate.
|
Democrats_win
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
5. The cons hate us for our freedom. We hate them for their lies and murders |
BeatleBoot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And, no, I wouldn't want to drink a beer with him either.
|
pocket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Reagan was pretty fucking bad
|
fricasseed_gourmet_rat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Weren't some of the antebellum presidents pretty awful? Like Millard Fillmore?
|
tmooses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-19-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I thought Nixon was devisive, but Bush is even worse. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message |