Where was the "heightened chatter"? Where were the signs of...

[Zenlitened]

... "increased activity"?

I just heard some jackass "analyst" on local TV referring to Democrats being suspicious of all the "terror alerts" running up to the election last November.

He said today's attack in London should put an end to that sort of talk.

But doesn't it make the suspicion all the more apt? When they're fucking around with the American public, stoking peoples' fears, it seems they have no trouble detecting "chatter" and "activity."

Why is that? Because it was completely faked? Phony terror, lots of chatter... actual attack, not a peep? What's up with that?

:shrug:

[Javaman]

1. I agree, I posted something about this earlier...

Why no chatter? And how come there wasn't the usual briefing to the effect that the chatter has dropped off thus meaning an attack is soon...

it's all bullshit. They can spin it anyway they want. personally, they let this one happen.

[Bluebear]

2. I posted exactly the same

No "chatter" this time DR. Rice?

[anitar1]

3. Maybe the listening posts have been outsourced? n/t

[cthrumatrix]

4. goes to show you...it was BS