Bush either uses, or discards British intelligence to suit his needs.....

[Purrfessor]

Here is one of many questions that I'd like the media to ask Bush: If British intelligence is so precise and trustworthy as some in your administraion have stated, why do you accept British claims that the Iraq-Niger uranium connection is valid, yet reject their conclusion that the so-called mobile biological weapons labs are in fact nothing more than platforms used to produce hydrogen for weather ballons?



Comments?

[zbdent]

1. Another question -

Why was Clinton's intelligence data on Iraq so full of bull in 1998 but now is one of the key elements used by Bush to defend the war in 2003?