Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Insurgents" - fucking media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:35 PM
Original message
"Insurgents" - fucking media
right. not a SINGLE citizen of Iraq is fighting back.

all "insurgents"

thanks CNN :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. T Jefferson
G Washington, J Adams & c. were insurgents to George III
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. well, it beats calling them "terrorists", anyway
these days, words seem to mean nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know, right? I guess that sounds so much better than
Iraqi Patriots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiona Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Insurgent doesn't sound bad to me...
it's just anyone fighting against established authority. It doesn't have a uniformly negative association. It's much preferable to simply calling them "terrorists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think it's a nuetral term.
Better than "Freedom fighters, Rebels, Guerillas, terrorists"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. dictionary.com
in·sur·gent (adj.)

Rising in revolt against established authority, especially a government.
Rebelling against the leadership of a political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. soon i fear
they will call us "insurgents"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. They called Dean the insurgent Dem during the primaries
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 05:48 PM by Raiden
I disliked them calling him that because they also called the Iraqi "terrorists" insurgents - basically creating a subconscious meme that Dean is with the opposition in Iraq and therefore against the troops or whatever

But as a term, "insurgent" seems like the appropriate thing to call the rebels in Iraq --- Especially as opposed to "terrorist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course
Gotta keep the pro-war nonsense going. Can't even tell the truth about ONE thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What would you call them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. how about
citizens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. But it's a select group of citizens
Not all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. right
the ones who are strong enough or don't want to be occupied or 'westernized'

i.e. patriots if the invasion happened here

don't you watch the movies? you know, the ones where America is invaded and the HEROS fight back and win against all odds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Look at it this way
If every time a bomb went off in Iraq the media refered to it as "Iraqi citizens, blowing up Iraqi citizens and U.S. Troops."
All that would happen is people like freepers and all other sorts of racists would be able to justify their fuck-up views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. so, propoganda rhetoric is ok?
:shrug:

worked so well during the coverage of Viet Namn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I just think calling them citizens groups them with the rest of the nation
Iraq is a divided and diverse place and many different groups are shooting at coalition troops and at other Iraqis.
I think Insurgent is nuetral as it specifically means they are people fighting the established power. Hell, even the CBC uses that term and Canada is dead agains the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. They are the nation.
These "insurgents" are Iraqi civilians who have taken up arms and are fighting against murdering, raping invaders; and they have the support of the Iraqi people at large. Not unlike the Warsaw uprising.

"Insurgent" might be technically acceptable from a dictionary perspective but it's being used, at least in the U.S., as a synonym for "terrorist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. You sound like someone who wants fair neutral media
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 05:55 PM by HEyHEY
"These "insurgents" are Iraqi civilians who have taken up arms and are fighting against murdering, raping invaders; and they have the support of the Iraqi people at large."

So often people slam the media. The only real reason being the media isn't representing their EXACT view. So then they accuse them of being bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. The American media IS biased. Deeply so.
You had a thread on Nancy Grace today, right? She's Walter Cronkite compared to some of this crap.

Media here says "insurgent" with a kind of sneering disgust that means "terrorist" the same way a klan member will say "black" as a replacement for "nigger."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. but look what the rhetoric is SUPPOSED to mean
here in the U.S., the sheeple have been conditioned to mean that "insurgents" are outside "evil" forces

right or wrong, that is what CNN and FAUX have been feeding us.

THAT is the bullshit i'm calling them on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Well, as someone who detests US news
I can't say I've watched enough to draw that conclusion or dispell it. However if what you say is true then it probably wouldn't matter what word they used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Alternatively: "freedom fighter" = terrorists we like
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. That would be correct.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. See also: Contras, Nicaragua
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Well, that word takes sides too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. That's the point, isn't it?
That we use different labels based on based on a group's percieved status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. The media's purpose
Is to not take sides on such things, for good or ill. I understand this doesn't always happen if at all in the US. But regardless insurgent really seems to be the only fair term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Hmmm...interesting point.
Main Entry: 1in·sur·gent
Pronunciation: -j&nt
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin insurgent-, insurgens, present participle of insurgere to rise up, from in- + surgere to rise -- more at SURGE
1 : a person who revolts against civil authority or an established government; especially : a rebel not recognized as a belligerent
2 : one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one's own political party

However, insurgent just has a negative connotation for some reason. Maybe it's because we know our media is full of crap...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. As I said above
I stopped watching US garbage with any kind of regularity a while back. But CBC and the BBC use it and it works well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. or perhaps....Iraqi citizens?
if someone came up your street and wiped out your entire family right in front of your eyes...would you be pissed, would YOU want to kill someone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Bush lied us into this war and thousands die while his cronies get rich
All this from a punk who hid from going to war himself - that's the real slap in the face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Insurgents is a fair word.
Terrorists is not necessarily a fair word. It depends on the act. Attacking civilians would be terrorism. Attacking uniformed troops (and cops) is not really terrorism. Taht said, all war is terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. Some of them are called surviving family members!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. insurgents are Iraqiis
their are multiple factions fighting:

for example in the civil war the South was referred to as the rebels, and the North as the union

I don't see what the problem is using insurgent?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. insurgents are Iraqi's? if they weren't - they sure as hell are now!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Wha?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. frankly we are in the middle of a civil war in Iraq
which we are directly responsible for. How bad it gets, no one knows, but when it is all over Iraq will end up as a Shiite theocracy, something the neocons never would have wanted


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. I'm still praying they all vote in the communists one day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. don't think that will happen
most likely a Shiite theocracy aligned with Iran

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Yeah, but if they voted in the commies it'd be such a kick to Bushco's nut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. The Insurgency is a mixed bag of various groups and goals.
The Bush Regime along with the complicit Corp Media have managed to frame the entire Insurgency as "Terrorists" that are anti-democracy and attempting to stop Iraq from becoming a Democracy. The fact that some of the groups within the Insurgency are anti-U.S. Occupation and against Multi-Corp take over of Iraq is no longer mentioned.

Now that Iraq has an alliance with Iran a new dynamic is taking shape.

It is much more complicated that the Corp. Media has been portraying. It is not only Shi'ites against Sunnis. Almost half of the Kurds are Sunni. Not all Sunnis were Ba'athists either. Iraq has around 100 different political parties with quite divergent political bents, even a Communist Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. I always get on hubby about this.
The other day he used that 'i' word and I pleaded with him to use the words 'citizens of Iraq'. I told him we'd been through it all before and that they were people protecting their country and homes just like we would if someone had done that to us. He said one word is as good as another and I disagreed. If we are to change public perception then we must use the proper words. The RW has learned this lesson well. *Sigh* how can I ever get anyone else to do this if my own democratic husband will not do it?

demgurl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
38. Pretty soon it will "The Insurrection" full on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC