Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Fitzgerald's time up?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:30 AM
Original message
Is Fitzgerald's time up?
<<SNIP>>
http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-fitz04.html


Is Fitzgerald's time up?

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald was a bit coy Wednesday when asked if he wants to stay on the job.

"I'm going to just do my job until somebody tells me otherwise," he said. "I love my job. I'm very, very lucky to work with the people behind me. I have no plans to do anything else."

U.S. attorneys traditionally serve about four years.

Fitzgerald has served four years.

But Fitzgerald is not a traditional U.S. attorney.

He is an out-of-towner who has proven he has no sacred cows, indicting former Gov. George Ryan, investigating Mayor Daley's inner circle and bringing an investigation to the door of presidential adviser Karl Rove.

Stepping on big toes like that has led to speculation he'll be shown the door, but others say the bad press the Bush administration would get from moving him out would not be worth it.

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. if they don't hire renew his appointment in Chicago
he will have no trouble finding work after his job as special prosecutor is finished


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. hmmm-- could this be why the WH appears so unworried....
They don't have to "fire" Fitzgerald-- only let the DOJ end his tenure "naturally," then count on it taking years to get his successor up to speed with the investigation? Or appoint a successor who will deliberately low-ball the Plame investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. His position
with the DoJ and in Chicago are distinct. The OP has nothing to do with his Plame connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. thanks for the correction....
I'm clueless about stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC