Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who would be the "weakest" Democrat we could nominate...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:45 PM
Original message
Who would be the "weakest" Democrat we could nominate...?
to run for the Presidency? Would it be a liberal or a moderate? Would it be a Hillary or a Bayh? Would it be a Gore or a Warner? Would it be a Kerry or a Clark? Who would be the "weakest" and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary or Edwards
Hillary won't pick up any red states and Edwards would be branded as too "fluffy" during a time of war.

Just my two cents, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Biden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. biden, lieberman, bayh, hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Why? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lieberman, than Hilary
Lieberman because he, well, sucks and the base would desert him.

Hilary because the mass public has been so propagandized against her that it would be difficult to put together a winning majority.

Why the Democratic party allowed the Hilary bashing to go on unchallenged, I'll never know. But we did, and she is ruined as a national candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Lieberman, then Kerry, then Hilary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. I'd ruled Kerry out of the equation
already. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Zell Miller
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. It said "Democrat"
Zell doesn't count any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Probably whoever is being touted by the media at the time.
Dems have a real ability to let the media pick our nominee--with predictable results. I hope to hell our party is OVER that in time for the next round of elections.

Here lately it has been Hillary that the media is pushing, but that could change in the next year or two...


Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Right on the money.
The RW media has been pushing Hillary really hard.

Let's find an outsider this time that they don't have 20 years worth of quotes and footage of - Someone actually capable of winning the popularity contest that is the presidential election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Anybody selected by the image consultants
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Leiberman. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lieberman, hands down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Any 'Dem' who supports "staying the course" in Iraq.
In my opinion, Kerry lost as soon as he voted the way he did on IWR. That's why Senators lose - they 'compromise' and collaborate. As such, they don't offer the voter a clear enough choice - it looks like Coke v. Pepsi to Bud Wiser.

Give me a Dem who says "Not one more American death for a Bush Lie!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Biden, Lieberman or Boxer
Biden -- been rejected before
Lieberman -- should be running in the repub party
Boxer -- I love her, but she would not sell in the midwest or south
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lieberman.. cause he only uses the Logo pasted over the NEOCON symbol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. This thread is like cutting at my flesh with a sharp instrument
But I do get to make a nomination! How about that DLC Iowan, Shrivel-sack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Why, TBA ?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. The Democrats are hardly in a commanding position
And although the administration is careening into the gutter of history with historic scandals and failures, it seems there is no means for the Democratic Party to get ahead.

I would like to see the party lead on global warming and getting the hell out of Iraq, two ideas that could get traction, but I don't see it happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Freedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Do you mean
weakest Democract in the sense that they couldn't win or weakest in the sense that they aren't true Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. "Weakest" in your opinion...
What criteria would you use?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Freedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Then...
weakest Democrat in the sense that they couldn't win: Edwards (too boyish, too nice -- not tough enough looking and acting for red state voters.)
weakest in the sense that they aren't true Democrats: Lieberman and Miller (because they are Republicans);-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Evan Bayh.
Bayh always comes off as a guy who got talked into going to a party, but has no real interest in being there. And he doesn't come across as being particularly smart or savvy either.

NOT TO MENTION, he's within the leadership of the DLC -- and we know what that means -- "put your dreams away... for another day....."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Aw c'mon, Bayh is great!!!
If we've learned nothing over the last several elections its that we need to nominated MORE BORING STIFFS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Alan Colmes
why are we having this discussion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hillary Would Lose In An Utter Landslide
I doubt very seriously if she could take 30% of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Just like anyone against her in 2000 was sure to get at 48% because that
many people "hated" her? She got 56% by the way. That is, every one who didn't totally hate her AND 4% of the people who did totally hate her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTD Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. True. She would probably fare worse than Mondale.
For those too young to recall, Mondale lost to Reagan back in 1984 by an Electoral College tally of 525 to 13.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready2Snap Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. To what end?
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 01:20 PM by Ready2Snap
You must be really bored or a latent troll.
Go outside and play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. Doesn't "weakest" by definition mean ONE? Why all the posts with 2 or more
names? They can't ALL be the weakest. I go with Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hillary, Biden, Bayh, Kerry, or any other pro-war candidate.
The issue has become the war and occupation of Iraq. That is, and has been, the Republican's weakest link. Kerry and Edwards gave them a free ride by supporting it themselves.

The DLC formula of Democrats running as Republicans is a flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. DiFi nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'd have to say Lieberman.
Oh wait. You said Democrat. Nevermind. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. Hillary
Mainly because she is too damn polarizing. She doesn't have a particularly good style of public speaking either. Not that that should matter after babbling Bunnypants, but it probably will.

We also need to stear clear of nominating someone from the Northeast.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Ive said this before
The GOP has been quiet on Hillary for the most part,Santorum is another matter.I do believe they want her to run becuase they think they know how to take her down.All the smears we heard about her and Bill Clinton while she was in the White House is going to be dredged up through proxies and the gloves will come off.Count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
38. Locking
after many revisions and edits of the Lock reason, the reason is "Flamebait"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC