Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting tidbit from Time Magazine re: John Robert's children's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:20 PM
Original message
Interesting tidbit from Time Magazine re: John Robert's children's
Edited on Fri Aug-05-05 09:40 PM by mohinoaklawnillinois
adoption:

"Jack McCay, law partner of Roberts’ wife Jane and a friend, speaks of the couple’s adoption of John (Jack) and Josephine, born in Ireland 4 1/2 months apart. “As frequently happens when you go through the adoption process, some of the efforts weren’t successful, and it continued for a time … But when the opportunity came along to have not just one but two kids, they took both babies without blinking.”

http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1086120,00.html

According to the reports from the corporate media at the time of the announcement weren't these children supposed to be adopted from South America and they were at least two apart in age?

Just wonderin....

edited to fix link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your link doesn't seem to be working
Edited on Fri Aug-05-05 09:34 PM by Island Blue
I thought I'd heard that they were further apart in age than 4 1/2 months. (I thought it was something like 2 years.) I do love that Dancin' Jack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Upon further review
I checked out the Wikipedia entry for Judge Roberts, and according to that, the children are 5 and 2 and were adopted from Latin America.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Roberts_Jr.


Hmmmmm. Strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's the question.. Why would the friend be told
they were from ireland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. and why should we care about his kids or the adoption?
is no one entitled to a private life? sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Bill Clinton should have been entitled to a private life........
and he was crucified by hypocrites for trying to have one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. i agree completely!
but because the GOPosse went on a witch hunt against bill clinton doesn't mean that anyone should have the right to go digging around in the adoption records of little children. where the hell is the decency in that? we bitch here all the time about what rove did to mcain about his adopted child. i'm sorry, but the kids are off fucking limits. john roberts is the one that'll be sitting on the bench, not his pre-schoolage kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Look at the picture on post #11
Roberts is clearly willing to use his wife and kids in order to attempt to paint a picture-perfect illusion of himself to advance his career. Anybody you ever know take their wife and kids to a job interview? The man's not running for office, here: he's just brought his family along for window dressing.

No, the kids don't deserve it. The kids should be at home with the nanny!

Besides, if a man is going to decide on the reproductive freedoms of American women, I'm sorry, but yes, his own reproductive choices (and the fact that he has so many, compared to the poor of this country) do have some bearing on the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Well, I think we Democrats need to get off the high road.......
Being intelligent and classy is causing us to get our clocks cleaned by the loud-mouthed, boorish right-wing pundits, like hannity and o'lielly.

Remember, Jon Stewart was aggressive and rude to Tucker Carlson on a visit to Crossfire last fall - but he got all his points across in big way!

It's long past time to stop being polite to these bastards! Turnabout is fair play!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. The link worked for me
I find this report quite confusing. Everything else I have read about the Roberts' adopted children says they are from Latin America.

Could this family friend, or TIME magazine have mispoken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. There's no by-line
I was going to say "email the author of the article",
but there's no name listed, and the link for other articles
by the author has a blank entry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well according to the State Department in order to adopt
an Irish born child, you have to be a permanent resident of Ireland.

Somehow, I don't think Judge Roberts and his wife quite qualify for that requirement.

http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/population/children/adoptions/Ireland.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Those kids sure don't look to be 4 1/2 months apart, to me.
Why is the press bothering with this, unless there's something untoward that went on behind the scenes? Could it be that Roberts took a rich man's shortcut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. They look roughly the same age to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Cute kids - sure look Irish, not Latino, though.
The fact of adopting their kids is significant to me because I have found that people who are unable to get pregnant can be EXTREMELY judgmental and resentful of - even outraged at women who choose to end pregnancies.

Also, I wonder how these kids are being raised - the little boy is bopping around at an extremely serious public moment, while his Mother stands demurely with downcast eyes and is not even attempting to restrain the kid. Meanwhile, the daughter is hanging on to Mom for dear life and looking very shy. Oh well, maybe all those stereotypical beliefs about the difference between the sexes is true? Or is that how conservatives raise their kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Maybe if she hadn't waited till she was in her 40s
to get married, she could have had kids. Odd that her husband waited so long. Or maybe he realized he needed a wife and kids to complete his resume, considering his ambitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. A major shortcut
Especially if these kids are from Ireland. Roberts and his wife don't meet the legal requirements to adopt from Ireland. If they took a shortcut, that makes it an international matter.

This isn't about the kids, it's about possible illegal activities in their parents' past. Illegal activities by a SC nominee, no less. If true, this is a lot worse than paying a 'nanny' off-the-books. Family values and all that. :eyes: Yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yep.. Buying and selling humans is never a 'good thing"
Edited on Fri Aug-05-05 11:58 PM by SoCalDem
BUT for a price.. a rich couple can always get a child..There are many poor young women all over the world, who would happily be inseminated, carry a child (or 2) and hand them over ..for a PRICE..

You can call it adoption, but it's really child-selling..

Imagine that you are a blonde, fair-skinned poor latin american woman, and a rich gringo offers you ...say...1 million dollars to provide him with 2 kids.. He provides the doctor, the hospital, and maybe moves you to a different location where your family/friends think you are "going to school".. A couple of years pass (and maybe school IS included),. you return to your family, apparently unchnaged, except for the fact that you have a bank account with enough money to last a good long time in a poor country..

Instead of a lifetime of menial work, she now has the opportunity to open her own business, or finish college
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. True, but this case is ... odd
Edited on Sat Aug-06-05 01:01 AM by txindy
This isn't a third world country in question here, it's Ireland. At least, this 'friend' in the article thinks it's Ireland. Previous stories have said South America. :shrug: Anyway, the major difference there is that it would be ILLEGAL for Roberts and his wife to adopt from Ireland unless one of them was a permanent, legal resident of that country. So says Irish law, anyway.

There's something very odd here.

Adding: Just to clarify, I meant that Ireland has virtually no unemployment and one of the most robust economies in the world. Not to mention a stringent legal system. I should imagine that all of this would make it very difficult to 'buy' a child from that country, let alone two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Perhaps the friend was 'told" they were from Ireland...
If my neighbor/friend told me something like that i would have no reason to doubt her.. All the recent articles have said latin America, and I have seen no feverish requests to retract..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I know, that's what's so bizarre about it all
Time magazine reported this story, so surely they know the background of previous stories. (Or am I being naive? ;) ) Why didn't they point out the disparity of stories being told and why do those disparities exist in the first place? That in and of itself is a story. Surely this isn't another fact that Roberts just 'forgot'. He does seem to have a memory like a sieve when it comes to certain situations. A very convenient sieve.

It's all very suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Rich man's short cut
indeed.

This smells of "Look at me how I love children so much. Children as political tools.

And I know people that adopt or otherwise nurture children because the children need help.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC