Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do your Freeper acquaintances use WWII analogies to justify the Iraq War?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:45 PM
Original message
Do your Freeper acquaintances use WWII analogies to justify the Iraq War?
It seems to be such a common tactic. They feel this need to borrow moral authority for the Iraq war from a war that has been over for 60 years now. Saddam is Hitler, Osama is Hitler, Bush is Churchill and liberal Democrats are the appeasers (btw, Neville Chamberlin was a Conservative).

Their logic seems to be that because that war was justified, this one must therefore be of equal moral necessity. It's almost a tacit admission that the Iraq war cannot be justified on its own terms, without resorting to specious analogies from 60 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good one
people are always pulling this crap.

call them on it.

the Nazis were trying to take over the world, and were murdering people by the millions. We had no choice but to fight them.

compared to Hitler and the Nazis, Saddam Hussien was a pathetic little prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midnight Rambler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Saddam really seems more like a wannabe Stalin
Or some kind of Banana Republic style dictator.

Although, the Hitler analogy does seem to fit when you take into account that in both cases, the Bush family facilitated the rise to power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, it's the fact it's specious that's irritating.
They should compare Gulf One, where we declared war after Saddam actually DID agressively attack another nation and actually HAD a WMD program and WMD. And we stopped when those threats were ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyIsGrey Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Then why not compare....
the Iran-Iraq war were "Saddam actually DID aggressively attack another nation and actually HAD a WMD program and WMD"? Which were oh so generoU.sly S.upplied by a nA.tion that will remain un-named. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But that was DIFFERENT
then he was OUR aggressive attacking bastard. Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyIsGrey Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Who then?
Hitler or Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Remember one thing
Saddam attacked Iran in 1980, long before the US was arming him up. The Carter Administration wanted nothing to do with him, even as Iran was holding our people hostage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. what is this freeper acquaintance that you speak of...?
I can honestly say that I don't believe I know any republicans (outside of my own family, who I haven't talked to for years).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. How sad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. sad that I don't know any republicans?
I live in a very liberal community in northern california. I think I'm rather lucky! Or sad that I'm estranged from my family? I'm 50 years old, and it's been a REALLY long time (I left home at 15), so there's no sadness there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't talk to freepers anymore...
and not only do I not see freeper relatives as much as before, when I do see them I avoid the subject whenever possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is a competely fallacious gambit ...
Edited on Sun Aug-07-05 08:05 PM by Trajan
Nazi Germany rampaged across Europe, invading and occupying most of the European nations, but Iraq was within it's own borders: completely contained on their own land .....

Nazi Germany possessed a horrific army of massive proportions, beyond what was necessary for thier own defense, using technical prowess and superior design to create a powerful military machine second to NONE on the earth ....

What was Iraq's army ? .... Two camels and a peashooter ? ...

Hmmmmmmmm ... WHICH nation NOW possesses the greatest, most powerful army that is SECOND TO NONE on this earth ? ...

WHICH nation used their army to cross an internationally recognized border without being legitimately threatened by the nation inside of that border ? ...

WHO invaded WHO ? ...

I think that comparisons with Nazi Germany are QUITE apt, actually, though they are NOT the comparisons which they will expect .... The analogy between the US and Nazi Germany, however one wishes to hide from the truth, are, unfortunately, justified based on those points ....

They are proper analogies ....

It makes me sad to say it, though ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, the only one today invading countries is *. So that would make
* = Hitler. Saddam is a 2 bit dictator who tortured some of his people. There are a lot of them. Asama doesn't even lead a country. He invaded no one. Saddam invaded Kuwait with approval of Bush1.

Patriotism seems to be a disease. I never realized it before until 9-11. I thought we were beyond that but I guess not. Where do you go or what do you do when you realize the real enemy is your own country? This is too much to take for most people. Even my 89 year old life-time Democratic father sprouts the patriotic rhetoric. He was in the navy and lost a brother in WW2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC