Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Beginning with an orbital speed of about 17,500 mph"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:42 PM
Original message
"Beginning with an orbital speed of about 17,500 mph"
I'm just saying!! - GOOD LUCK!


" .... Snip .....

Under new guidelines, Discovery will follow a trajectory that takes it largely over ocean.

Beginning with an orbital speed of about 17,500 mph, the shuttle is scheduled to enter the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean and glide over Nicaragua, Cuba and the Gulf of Mexico.

It then should pass over Florida's Lake Okeechobee and, moving at about 220 mph, touch down at the Kennedy Space Center

......Snip "

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/08/07/space.shuttle/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Love NASA but the shuttle program should be ended...
Just like Mercury, Gemini and Apollo were ended. Shuttle technology is around 30 years old, which might as well be 300 years...maybe they should hire the guy who designed the privately funded Spaceship One; he seems to be using state of the art technology...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think it is ended. For all intents & purposes. They would never live
it down if they sent up a new shuttle and something went wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree. Think back 30 years and recall what computers were like then,
for example. I was programming & running a Data General "mini" with a whole 16K of core (true core, the little ferrite doughnuts!) and the hard drive was the size of a washing machine and held a disk about 14 inches in diameter...TEN MEGABYTES. I wrote the payroll program for the company I worked for in Fortran, of all things...had to use a LOT of overlays. :D

The shuttles are just, well, obsolete. We can do better, lighter, cheaper and safer. JMO...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i seem to recall a story they did about the computer upgrade on the
shuttles about 5 years ago, if I recall right, they saved something like 400# by converting to a 486dx computer & increased calculation capability 1000 times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wow...a 486. DX no less...
:D

Well, at least they avoided the Pentium floating point division error...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. was the only space hardened processor abv at that time
don’t forget, all the electronics have to be hardened due to radiation.


Plus, they prob had designed the actual upgrade 10 years before the upgrade was actually done.. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. LOL
But, old computer chips aside.
Mathematics is mathematics and riding the equivalent of an iron (like the old-fashioned irons you ironed your clothes with) must be 'The Biggest Thrill' (added to the thrill of being up there) on and above Earth!
Disney, Six Flags, Evil Keneval, bungee jumping, etc. have no claim on this.
The ones I feel sorry for are the ones that didn't make it into space. Those who did and died, I'm sure they would not have traded places with those of us alive who never got to see the wonders up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes. We can do better
There is one concern. Thirty years ago, this country had a robust manufacturing industry and the shuttle program drew heavily upon that. Now NASA procurement folk are browsing E-Bay looking for parts. Uh, we got a problem Houston.

There is a cost to outsourcing manufacturing and other jobs. Those costs are imposed on society. Companies that do so should not be permitted free access to American infrastructure, or the protection of its military and political might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC