Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Every Mother's Son (for Cindy Sheehan and Casey)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 12:32 AM
Original message
Every Mother's Son (for Cindy Sheehan and Casey)
(pls. don't forward, still rough)

“The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.”

- Stephen King


George W. Bush hauled stakes for Texas and a vacation a few days ago. Cindy Sheehan followed. She got off a bus Saturday afternoon and started walking to the Crawford ranch. She wanted some answers and was going to get them.

Sheehan had met Mr. Bush once before. On April 4, 2004, just shy of a year after Bush stood on an aircraft carrier beneath a banner that read ‘Mission Accomplished,’ Cindy Sheehan’s son, Army Specialist Casey A. Sheehan, was killed in Iraq when his unit was attacked by rocket-propelled grenades and small-arms fire. He was 24 years old.

After Casey’s death, Cindy Sheehan was invited to the White House for a visit with Mr. Bush in June of 2004. Her first memory of Bush’s appearance that day was when he walked into the room and said in a loud, bluff voice, “Who we’all honorin’ today?”

"His mouth kept moving,” Sheehan later recalled of her meeting with Bush, “but there was nothing in his eyes or anything else about him that showed me he really cared or had any real compassion at all. This is a human being totally disconnected from humanity and reality. His eyes were empty, hollow shells.” Bush called her ‘Ma’ or ‘Mom’ throughout the whole meeting, and never got around to learning her name.

"The whole meeting was simply bizarre and disgusting,” Sheehan said later. “designed to intimidate instead of providing compassion. He didn’t even know our names. I just couldn’t believe this was happening. It was so surreal and bizarre. Later I met with some of the other fifteen or sixteen families who were at the White House the same day and, sure enough, they all felt the same way I did.”

That was it. Cindy Sheehan, who had never been politically active in her life, became an activist. She traveled the country speak to whomever would listen, she told the story of Casey’s life and death, and she threw fire at George W. Bush with the passionate anguish of a mother who was forced to bury her son.

“Casey was told that he would be welcomed to Iraq as a liberator with chocolates and rose petals strewn in front of his unarmored Humvee” Sheehan wrote in February. “He was in Iraq for two short weeks when the Shi'ite rebel ‘welcome wagon’ welcomed him to Baghdad with bullets and RPG's, which took his young and beautiful life. Casey was killed after George Bush proclaimed ‘Mission Accomplished’ on May 1, 2003. Hundreds of our young people and thousands of Iraqis have been needlessly and senselessly murdered since George Bush triumphantly announced an end to ‘major combat’ almost 2 years ago now. All of the above events have been heralded by this administration as ‘turning points’ in the ‘war on terror’ – or as wonderful events in the ‘march of democracy.’”

In June of 2005, Cindy Sheehan testified at a hearing in Washington DC about the Downing Street Minutes, the recently leaked British intelligence documents which exposed the fact that Bush intended to invade Iraq almost from the beginning of his first term, and that “Intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy” of invasion.

“I believed before our leaders invaded Iraq in March, 2003,” said Sheehan in her testimony, “and I am even more convinced now, that this aggression on Iraq was based on a lie of historic proportions and was blatantly unnecessary. The so-called Downing Street Memo dated 23 July, 2003 only confirms what I already suspected: the leadership of this country rushed us into an illegal invasion of another sovereign country on prefabricated and cherry picked intelligence. It appears that my boy Casey was given a death sentence even before he joined the Army in May of 2000.”

And so it came to pass that George W. Bush hauled stakes for Texas and a vacation a few days ago, and Cindy Sheehan followed. She got off a bus Saturday afternoon and started walking to the Crawford ranch. She wanted some answers and was going to get them. She got as far as a police checkpoint, and has gotten no further. She is still there, waiting to speak to Mr. Bush so she can get an answer to her question. Why did her son die?

The folks on the Crawford ranch sent out some important people to speak to her. They sent Stephen Hadley, the national security adviser. They sent Joe Hagin, a deputy White House chief of staff. Cindy Sheehan sent them both packing.

On Sunday night, the New York Times published a story about Sheehan’s Texas standoff. “Her success in drawing so much attention to her message - and leaving the White House in a face-off with an opponent who had to be treated very gently even as she aggressively attacked the president and his policies - seemed to stem from the confluence of several forces,” wrote the Times. “The deaths last week of 20 Marines from a single battalion has focused public attention on the unremitting pace of casualties in Iraq, providing her an opening to deliver her message that no more lives should be given to the war.”

“At the same time,” continued the article, “polls that show falling approval for Mr. Bush's handling of the war have left him open to challenge in a way that he was not when the nation appeared to be more strongly behind him. It did not hurt her cause that she staged her protest, which she said was more or less spontaneous, at the doorstep of the White House press corps, which spends each August in Crawford with little to do, minimal access to Mr. Bush and his aides, and an eagerness for any new story.”

Casey Sheehan was every mother’s son. Cindy Sheehan is every son’s mother. She loved him with every cell in her body and every breath in her soul, and mourns his absence in every second of every day, and will have some answers for her pain and loss, or will know the reason why. She is down in Crawford, right now, waiting for George W. Bush to stop sending lackeys to placate her. She wants to speak to the man who sent her son to die. She is waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. "....waiting for George W. Bush to stop sending lackeys to placate
her." EXACTLY. Great read before bed... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yvr girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Unfortunately, the deaths don't keep Bush up at night
"Hey! Hey! LBJ, how many kids did you kill today" worked because the man was troubled by the cost of the war - the human cost.

Bush doesn't care. He is no more troubled by the loss of life than he is by the loss of...equipment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Nope
But, Cindy isn't trying to get to him, she's attempting (and may well succeed) to finish the turning of the tide of public opinion.

Frankly as hard as this is on her, the worst thing that could happen, IMO, is if Bush actually comes out to talk to her. Sure, she might get a news cycle that way, but right now, she's winning hearts and minds every minute she is out there. Since Bush has neither a heart nor a mind, he is pretty irrelevent to this process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. And Cindy Sheehan is well aware of that, which why she is
set to become bush**'s worst nightmare during his VACATION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good read, WillPitt n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great post Will (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, you might think it's 'rough' but I can't see anything wrong with it.
However,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"After Casey’s death, Cindy Sheehan was invited to the White House for a visit with Mr. Bush in June of 2004. Her first memory of Bush’s appearance that day was when he walked into the room and said in a loud, bluff voice, “Who we’all honorin’ today?”"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I've never heard "bluff" used as an adjective...but it does connote what it represents in a way that might resonate with readers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great as always Will
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wonderful
As usual.

One thing didn't work for me though. It wasn't a problem with the concept but rather the implementation of your linking paragraphs about George W. Bush hauling up stakes. They were both a little too similar. It jarred me and caused me to go back and check if they were the same and I did it right in the middle of your essay.

But as you said, this is rough draft. I hope you won't ditch it completely. I've seen you use a similar device elegantly a number of times before and in a second read, it isn't as jarring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. A couple of nits...
paragraph 6 - either "she traveled the country to speak" or "she traveled teh country speaking"

last paragraph - "and will have some answers for her pain and loss, or will know the reason why." - I know what you mean here but it just reads funny.

Otherwise, I liked it. :) GO CINDY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Link to final
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm with her in spirit
And when she gets to meet the high one I hope she demands that at least three media types get to hear and record everything that is said. She should not allow the meeting to be private. This is a public affair and we deserve to hear every word our resident has to say about the matter.

On the home front, it seems major combat operations, ala the Viet Nam war protests, are just beginning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC