Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since oil company profits are up 40+ %, why don't they

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:51 AM
Original message
Since oil company profits are up 40+ %, why don't they
start building some of those refineries they claim they need so badly to "hold prices down"..Every time someone dares to ask them why prices are so high, they always have that old excuse handly.. "20 refineries closed"..Um who closed them?? They did! Why? because their "exclusions" were running out, and they would have had to upgrade their pollution controls, so they just closed them down.. the silver lining in their plan, was tat they could then create their own scarcity..

"Gee it gets COLD in the winter?? who knew? every winter"? Every year they use the "switchover" as a reason why supplies get scarce and costs go up. Maybe they could use some of these outrageous profits and build some refineries that were located in areas of need... say..

a heating oil facility in the northeast..and more gasoline refineries where people have big commutes..

they have the power to "self-regulate" so that their supply is stable, but they prefer the instability..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Until demand goes down....why should they?
They're a business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. well that would cut into their PROFITS, now, wouldn't it?? THINK woman,
THINK! The oil cos are entitled to those profits dammit!!! Their CEOS are entitled to make millions each year while your grandma in Chicago eats dog food so she can heat her one room apartment in the winter.

Where in HELL are your priorities, girl? Oil co profits are far, far more important than people. You really must start thinking like a republican..

MORE refineries? Heck, shell just closed down the wildly profitable oil wells near bakersfield. they were making way, way too much money and producing far too much oil at virtually no cost. That could have lowered prices!!!

*Gaaah*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. wildly profitable oil wells near bakersfield?
I believe those are owned by the GOV.

If your talking about Elk Hills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No. Shell refineries near Bakersfield referenced in a company report
last year as 'wildly profitable' yet taken off line.

Gee the oil cos would never do something like that while proclaiming a shortage and staking out 40% increase in profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. In fairness, I can't think of a single community that would welcome one
but maybe there is one out there somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Alabama is fighting to GET nuclear reactors..maybe they want
some more refineries:) Call up ole Banjo-boy Jeff sessions..maybe he can get some refineries started:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. we've had one here for over 50 yrs
Cosden Refinery

In a small town of 25,000, it's pretty important to local economy. 6000 jobs not counting the support contractor and vendors. We've been lucky, other than a couple of small fires and no injury's, it's been great.

I'll take a refinery over a prison any day.

We now have 5 prisons on what used to an old airbase. Since the prisons started up our local crime rate has skyrocketed. Seems the prisoners families come with them, and thats made a big difference. We now have a major gang problem, and local burglaries and theft have tripled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. do you smell another enron?
i certainly do. i read the a journal of petroleum engineers every month and they are not really concerned about the great oil shortage. in fact they think the supply will increase as soon as fields off africa and brazil come on line in 2006-7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. they are doing fine the way things are
eventually, we'll have to pay to build their infrastructure with tax subsidies or incentives in addition to paying high prices at the pump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. They have all the refineries they need
They might need some different kind of refineries, to deal with stuff like phosphor-rich heavy crude and tar-sand.
But above all they need oil. They are scrambling to get to the smaller, more remote, lower quality, previously not so profitable fields. Some of which are in parts of the world where they can't just start drilling, so there will be a few coups and wars. And they are researching new extraction- and refinery technology.


The oil industry has been regulating itself reasonably well for many decades - until recently.
If this is only some trick to make more profits, then why didn't they think of this sooner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. What ever happened to the oil refineries and nuke plants moron*
was to build on old army bases???

That seems to have vanished off the radar...funny how that works. I bet the various senators with base closing in their respective states fed him a shit sandwich.

colossal failure*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_to_war_economy Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. the are saving all that money for the future security operations
it is gonna get ugly when peak oil peaks and people riot in the streets

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saphire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. I get a small royalty check from Unocal for oil on some property.
three years ago I got a check for about 40.00 every three months or so ( really small royalty) and now, three years later, with the price of oil at almost 65.00 per barrel, I get a check for about 40.00 every few months. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. They won't be sharing with their "small investors"
The big bucks are reserved for the "inner circle"..:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Let's take a trip down memory lane...
GOP lawmakers blame Clinton administration for high prices at the pump
June 23, 2000

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- House Republicans called Friday on the Environmental Protection Agency to lift cleaner fuel requirements in places hit hardest with rising gasoline prices and charged that the Clinton administration has long neglected to implement a national energy policy.


House Democrats, meanwhile, accused their GOP colleagues of playing a "fast and furious blame game" with hopes of taking full political advantage of the rising prices this election year.

Gas prices have soared this week to a national average of $1.64 a gallon, and to well over $2 a gallon in the Chicago and Milwaukee area, setting off a frenzy of finger-pointing involving the Clinton administration, Congress, oil companies and refineries, and the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.

Oil industry experts cite numerous possible culprits, including recent increases in the price of crude oil as well as the EPA-mandated sale of reformulated gasoline designed to cut back on smoggy skies -- a regulation five years in the making. More...

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/06/23/gas.prices/

THe GOPers were crying like little babies when the gasoline prices went up on Clinton's watch!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. How Bush Pushed Gasoline Prices Sky High
On March 5, 2003, Senator Carl Levin, the Ranking Minority Member of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, released a report prepared by the minority staff that reveals why gasoline prices soared under the Bush administration. It has to do with the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) and some odd decisions by the Department of Energy (DOE) after consulting with White House officials.

According to the Senate Report, the Bush administration added forty million barrels of oil to the nation’s reserves in 2002. That wouldn’t be a problem in and of it self. But the purchases represented an extreme change in energy policy; they were made in a strong market, with a tight supply of oil, which increased demand, which in turn pushed up the gasoline prices to their highest levels in twelve years.

The Senate report said in a one-month period in mid 2002 the Bush administration purchases caused crude oil prices to soar, raising the cost of heating oil by 13%, jet fuel by 10% and diesel fuel by 8%. The bottom line was the Bush policy change cost citizens between $500 million and $1 billion.

When crude oil jumps from $20 a barrel to $30, the Senate report says, the costs to U.S. taxpayers are an additional $1 million per day. “Over three months, the additional cost of filling the SPR approached $100 million,” which will ultimately be borne by U.S. taxpayers. More...

http://www.yuricareport.com/Energy/How%20Did%20Oil%20Prices%20Get%20so%20High.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC