Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rummy is getting heat from the press in news conf. msnbc and others.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:43 PM
Original message
Rummy is getting heat from the press in news conf. msnbc and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. he sounds very frustrated saying the press has misquoted him--that
the insurgents would lose interest (as their members are killed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. arguing for lots of progress and Iragi people reject violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. now they switched to a news conference by Bush in Crawford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. ?
?
?
?
more info?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. one the main things the reporters were asking --is when is this insurgency
going to end and saying that Rummy had on several times said so. but rummy disagreed and said he never said such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's not true. He's given his usual fluctuating answer to this.
In many venues, on many different occasions. It's ranged from 5,6,7, 8, 10, 12 years.

You know how Rummy likes to do that with estimates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah, you know, somewher North, South, East and West of
Baghdad. We know where they are. Really, we do. Shithead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. when I'm his age, I damn sure won't be standing behind a podium
lying to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is anyone asking about the DOD Unit that was tracking the 9/11 hijackers
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 09:42 AM by Skinner
inside the US in 2000? This is a bomshell that's going to get Bush impeached.

This pretty much confirms everything I’ve been saying for three years. Now, I want to know why Rummy’s shop let the UBL cells finish their mission, and what Bush’s orders prior to 9/11 really were.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/03/03/01_crimes.html


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/09/politics/09intel.html
NYT - August 9, 2005

Four in 9/11 Plot Are Called Tied to Qaeda in '00
By DOUGLAS JEHL

WASHINGTON, Aug. 8 - More than a year before the Sept. 11 attacks, a small, highly classified military intelligence unit identified Mohammed Atta and three other future hijackers as likely members of a cell of Al Qaeda operating in the United States, according to a former defense intelligence official and a Republican member of Congress.

In the summer of 2000, the military team, known as Able Danger, prepared a chart that included visa photographs of the four men and recommended to the military's Special Operations Command that the information be shared with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the congressman, Representative Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania, and the former intelligence official said Monday.

The recommendation was rejected and the information was not shared, they said, apparently at least in part because Mr. Atta, and the others were in the United States on valid entry visas. Under American law, United States citizens and green-card holders may not be singled out in intelligence-collection operations by the military or intelligence agencies. That protection does not extend to visa holders, but Mr. Weldon and the former intelligence official said it might have reinforced a sense of discomfort common before Sept. 11 about sharing intelligence information with a law enforcement agency.
A former spokesman for the Sept. 11 commission, Al Felzenberg, confirmed that members of its staff, including Philip Zelikow, the executive director, were told about the program on an overseas trip in October 2003 that included stops in Afghanistan and Pakistan. But Mr. Felzenberg said the briefers did not mention Mr. Atta's name.
The report produced by the commission last year does not mention the episode.

SNIP

In the interview on Monday, Mr. Weldon said he had been aware of the episode since shortly after the Sept. 11 attack, when members of the team first brought it to his attention. He said he had told Stephen J. Hadley, then the deputy national security adviser, about it in a conversation in September or October 2001, and had been surprised when the Sept. 11 commission report made no mention of the operation.
Col. Samuel Taylor, a spokesman for the military's Special Operations Command, said no one at the command now had any knowledge of the Able Danger program, its mission or its findings. If the program existed, Colonel Taylor said, it was probably a highly classified "special access program" on which only a few military personnel would have been briefed.

SNIP

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. 2000
Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch, Clinton's Watch

Don't be surprised if the teeming idiots buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. leveymg
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rummy......
Don RumsFailed looks really tired these days. He's aged quite a bit from the "70-year old Sex Symbol" like Bush proclaimed him in 2001. But that's what 4 years of non-stop lying does to you. Right, Don.

And really, wouldn't he like to retire some time soon? He's a multi-millionaire, worth $136 million. And he earned every dollar fair and square, by setting up crony contracts and selling arms to both sides.

And he DID say he's submitted his resignation twice, and both times it was rejected. Interesting, no? He wants to quit, but they WON'T LET HIM.

Now that's funny. We're going to have a banquet tonight. I'll call it the "Rummy can't quit" feast. We'll have pink champagne, and we'll clink our glasses together and laugh. The old fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Most of the questions had to do with is the insurgency winning or is the
coalition winning to which Rummy said YES the coalition was winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Seriously?
Now, that's news. I (must confess) I didn't read the article. Now I will, though.

I want to feast my eyes on the old coot actually saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC