Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FWIW--"Federal Whistle Blower Claims Chicago Grand Jury Indicted Bush..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:20 PM
Original message
FWIW--"Federal Whistle Blower Claims Chicago Grand Jury Indicted Bush..."
I don't know if this has been posted yet and I can't attest to the credibility of the source, but it does tend to brighten one's day...:)

Enjoy!

Federal Whistle Blower Claims Chicago Grand Jury Indicted Bush And Others For Perjury and Obstruction Of Justice; U.S. Attorney's Office Says 'No Comment,' Refusing To Confirm Or Deny Alleged Indictments.

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation into the Valerie Plame-CIA leak has now spilled over into Bush administration lies involving 9/11 and the war in Iraq, according to sources close to the Chicago probe.
August 2, 2005

By Greg Szymanski

Sources close to the Chicago federal grand jury probe into perjury and obstruction charges against President Bush and others said indictments were handed down this week, but a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Northern District of Illinois refused to comment.

“We are not talking about any aspect of this case and our office is not commenting on anything regarding the investigation at this time,” said Randall Sanborn from the office of U.S. federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, the attorney conducting the grand jury probe into whether Bush and others in his administration violated federal law in a number of sensitive areas, including the Valerie Plame CIA leak case, involvement in 9/11 and the illegal nature of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In December 2003, Fitzgerald was named Special Counsel to investigate the alleged disclosure of the identity of who leaked information in the Plame case, but the present grand jury probe has expanded to include the wide-reaching crime allegations as new information surfaced.

Although the U.S. Attorney’s office in Chicago is staying silent, it is well known that Fitzgerald is digging deep into an assortment of serious improprieties among many Bush administration figures based, in part, on subpoenaed testimony provided by former Secretary of State Colin Powell.

According to federal whistleblower Tom Heneghen, who recently reported on www.truthradio.com, Powell testified before the citizen grand jury that President Bush had taken the U.S. to war illegally based on lies, which is a capital crime involving treason under the U.S. Code.


(more)
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/30722.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Discussed and debunked.
Next, please. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. *sigh*
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. So this is not a credible source?
Sorry...put it did brighten my day, if only for a few minutes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. sadly, no
and this will get locked (just a warning)

its bunk (unfortunately) x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would that it only were so!!!!!!!
That would make my day!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. There has not been a second source to confirm any of this....
So most folks are not accepting it as authentic, it seems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's Tom Flocco.
That speaks for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ah, I see his name now in the article...
Damn! :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Regardless of its authenticity,
it does raise interesting questions.

How would members of a sitting president's administration be indicted, if, as is said so often, over the years they have usurped most all legal checks and balances to executive authority?

If this were to occur because there still are remaining legal checks and balances, would it be kept quiet for security reasons until all legal avenues of defense had been exhausted, or a new administration was already in place?

How does the above change with a presumption of guilt and the further corollary that they likely wouldn't limit themselves to only legal activities of defense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Locking
This story has been debunked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC