Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since when has "having an agenda" been a bad thing? (re Cindy)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:50 AM
Original message
Since when has "having an agenda" been a bad thing? (re Cindy)
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 08:53 AM by Brotherjohn
Critics of Cindy Sheehan on the Right just don't get it. In fact, they're clueless.

A typical conservative tactic is to find something they have often been accused of, and turn it on the left. But often, they just don't even understand the criticism they're trying to copy.

It's not a crime to "have an agenda". Everyone has an agenda... it's what you want to get done. She's not out there to get a suntan.

It's dishonest when you have a "hidden" agenda. For example, when conservatives claim they only want school vouchers so that competition can improve our schools, or intelligent design in schools because they only want honest intellectual debate (both are really about getting religion into our schools).

Of COURSE Cindy Sheehan has an agenda! She wears it on her sleeve (along with her heart). She's never been anything but 100% clear what her agenda is (even in her initial newspaper interview that the right tries to turn on her: see http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x146319).

Then some are saying "she sounds so scripted" and implying she's brainwashed by Move On and Michael Moore. Geez, now having convictions and being well-spoken means you're brainwashed?! I guess you need to sound like a babbling idiot to get some respect with this crowd.

The article in the link above quotes Bill O'Reilly citing "her association with "Fahrenheit 9/11" producer Michael Moore and other antiwar advocates as examples of her radicalization." Heaven forbid that an antiwar activist would hang out with other antiwar activists! And does he realize that "Fahrenheit 9/11" made over $200Million and was the top-selling documentary of all time? Oh yeah, and that Moore was RIGHT about the war being for "fictitious reasons"?

For Sheehan's critics to keep saying "she has some kind of agenda" simply reveals how clueless they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pointblank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Its only bad if you are a DEM
and you have an agenda...

Cae in point, the repukes used the images of 9/11 victims in their campaign ads in '04, but justified it by saying that it was reality.

You can't win with these people, they, frankly, are stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. You're exactly right.
This is another one of those bang-your-head-against-the-wall moments of stupidity. (By "moment," I mean the past 5 years...) :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. You simply don't understand.....sigh
Liberals have 'agendas' and 'conspiracies'.

Neo-cons have 'noble visions' and 'coalitions' and are 'firm in their beliefs' and have 'strong messages'.

Please report to room 1602d for re-education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. These are the same sort of people who said Rosa Parks had an "agenda"...
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 09:02 AM by Crankie Avalon
Rosa Parks was a member of the Montgomery, Alabama chapter of the NAACP for many years before she refused to give up her seat that fateful day in December, 1955. So, she was "radicalized" and "had an agenda," too, according to the same ilk who now try to smear Cindy Sheehan. She "associated" with Martin Luther King, Jr., whom the O'Reilly's of the era then felt safe in assailing.

Old-time segregationists, then...war-mogering chickenhawks, now. Birds of a feather.

For the likes of Bill O'Reilly to accuse anyone else of "politicking" and "radicalization" is maybe the biggest joke of all. Is there anyone more extreme and on the fringe than rightwingers like O'Reilly and the others who try to sell the line that an association with Michael Moore (a man who turned out to be completely right about "fictitious reasons" for going to war) should somehow be considered "damaging"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. That is the most abused word in the GOP lexicon
Of course she has an agenda. "A list or program of things to be done or considered" is how the dictionary defines it.

Somehow (like a lot of words) it has picked up an evil connotation. I think they intend it to mean "sneaky, underhanded, deceitful, nefarious" or something like that. I think it means all of the above to them. And I have no idea why.

Without agendas, meetings would be unfocused and unproductive. Without an agenda, any organization would be endlessly squabbling about what to do or say next.

So, Cindy has an agenda? Damn right she does. And she's accomplishing her goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It means "sneaky, deceitful, etc." to them b/c they're thinking "hidden"..
... agenda.

I really think the people who come up with this are completely and utterly stupid. They hear the word "agenda" when they get smacked for having a hidden agenda on school vouchers, or on, say, going the U.N. route" (the hidden agenda was trying to seek justification for a war they wanted)...

So to them, the word "agenda" gets a bad connotation, and they don't ever bother to look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC