Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHY are Religious Pro-Lifers Ok with using Fertility Drugs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:36 PM
Original message
WHY are Religious Pro-Lifers Ok with using Fertility Drugs?
my sister is a RW fundie for example. Southern Baptist wacko.

she took fertility drugs to get pregnant. WHY?

wasn't it "God's WILL" that she NOT be able to conceive?

this has always irked me.

i asked her about it once. she hung up on me :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not all are. Remember how freaked out some were over in vitro when
it was first being used?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm vehemently pro-choice and in-vitro freaks me out.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's the burning question.
And I wonder how that will play out if they actually get an embryo defined as a human being AND a citizen? Will infertile couples have to agree to carry to term every viable embryo created through IVF? Or will they outlaw this sort of infertility treatment completely?

Or will they carry on as usual as hypocrites?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. This has always bothered me too
Remember a few years back when a woman gave birth to multiple babies (I believe it was 7), all conceived through fertility drugs, but they wouldn't selectively abort any of them to give the others better chances at surviving because it was "against god's will". Whatever! If they really believe that then it was against gods will that they got pregnant in the first place. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because they are saved already and thus not included in any of
the moralizing they do? Or possibly because they are huge hypocrites...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnowGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it might be related to:
Hypocrisy.

theocracy/hypocrisy, tomayto/tomahto
Let's call the whole thing off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. eugenics, eugenics, eugenics (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. As long as you're bringing future Repugs into the world
it's perfectly OK to breed using fertility drugs. Now if you happen to be black or hispanic or from some other ethnic background that might predispose one to Dem Party values, well... you're just SOL, pal. }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. She is in such denial...
I don't think you can reach these people, until the effects of the Kool Aid wears off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:41 PM
Original message
god wants you to have all the christian babies you can.......
that way the collection plates weigh more each week. why is god so bad with his finances? :shrug: You;d think he had enough money by now, he needs to put himself on a strict budget.

Good question, matcom. THEY'RE PLAYING GOD BY DOING THAT! BLASPHEMY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftylady Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why are they OK with any kind of medicine.
Or any kind of science? Or any kinds of machines?

You just keep the stuff you like and make the rest a sin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friesianrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. And, why don't they adopt instead of having kids?
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 03:42 PM by friesianrider
I mean, those kids mothers "chose life" - I guess if they sit in an orphanage for the rest of their lives never knowing a family, well, that's okay.

IMHO, unless you've adopted at least one kid, you have no friggin' business demanding all these kids be born.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. Repukes only want to adopt white infants
Even if the babies are from Ireland, where it's illegal for non-Irish citizens or residents to adopt, Judge Roberts. :evilgrin:

On a more serious note: too much red tape: birth parents changing their minds at the last minute, grandparental interference, birth dads popping out at the last minute to block an adoption, etc. It makes my blood boil that birth fathers who are convicted rapists even have parental rights!

If the Repunks are really anything like the pro-life "Casey Dems", they'd do more on a national level to reduce or eliminate the unnecessary barriers to domestic adoption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't know, but ask Bush. Weren't Jenna and Not-Jenna conceived
that way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. W & Laura did too many drugs in their youth to able conceive naturally
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 04:31 PM by BrklynLiberal
....or maybe she just could not stomach having sex with him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. The twins are proof of Immaculate Conception
Put yourself in Pickles' pumps: Would you screw HIM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SonofMass Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Taking a drug to create life is no different than using medicine
or a procedure to get rid of a mass of cells. They can't think at any heightened level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Roman Catholic Church is technically against in-vitro...
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 03:59 PM by deadparrot
but no one really listens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Jesus wants them to be fruitful and multiply
and they probably feel that THEIR conception issues are a LIEBRUL experiment that was done on them without their knowledge..and since their insurance covers it, why not get all the value they can from that insurance..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. God "wants" what they want
Have you ever noticed how God's will and their desires are almost always the same thing? I suspect, however, that you did hit a nerve with your sister based on her reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. There's a great article about this in Harper's.
It talks about the new mega churches and how they basically reinforce people's selfishness by convincing them it's all part of God's plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well if she produces no children then her marriage should end, isn't that
what they say, marriage is to produce children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. I always thought that the McCaughey septuplets.
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 04:08 PM by Midlodemocrat
were a travesty. Sure, honey, it is God's will that you have a litter.

And, two of those children have disabilities. Their behavior makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. The same reason "Christian Raves" are OK...
The Byebull doesn't specifically condemn it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeanQuinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. No idea. It's hypocrisy at it's finest.
Nice mention on AAR last night by the way, Matcom. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. ??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeanQuinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Oh. Mike Malloy mentioned DU and how he's met some great people
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 04:46 PM by SeanQuinn
like benburch and matcom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. they're excessively malthusenthusiastic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. actually... they should fight to mandate them
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 04:23 PM by enki23
they increase the probability of successful implantation. if every woman of childbearing age were required to be on them we'd save more baby souls than outlawing abortion ever could. as with terri shiaivo, every life needs every chance we can give it.

if it's really about saving the babies, and they are babies from the moment of conception, then there can be no argument here. the rights of the mother, regarding forced medication, are not significant when considering the value of each precious human soul. failed implantation kills millions upon millions of babies every year. every life must be protected to the fullest extent we can, especially... ESPECIALLY innocents such as these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysolde Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. This has always irked me & my husband too.
It's a fundamental hypocrisy to pick and choose medical procedures that are okay while saying others aren't okay (God wanted Terri Schiavo to die, why were they defying God?). But, these folks live with such huge amounts of cognitive dissonance constantly that this is really small-scale for them. I mean, the Bible is the literal word of God no matter how contradictory it is -- if they actually thought about anything their heads would explode.

The other thing that irks us both is that they are not Pro-Lifers. They are simply Pro-Birth. The only life that seems to matter is that of the child from conception to birth because they sure don't care about it after it's born. An example: My brother spouts how wrong abortion is, but when you want him to support policies to help lift women and children out of poverty, he's all of a sudden "not his brother's keeper". WTF? So, we don't talk. Bottom line: hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance will keep any of them from actually thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Could it be because they are self-righteous hypocrites whose principles
change on a moments notice to suit their own selfish needs?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lotus Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. They should adopt!
I'm not too thrilled about them either. Too much risk of multiple sickly births, and there are plenty of "unadoptable" needy children out there desperately hoping for a good home. If you can't figure out how to have kids and want them, you should adopt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Fertility drugs (over)stimulate ovulation
but allow couples to conceive by having sex. They simply provide a "booster shot" to increase the chances of a couple conceiving naturally.

Fertility drugs are not the same as in vitro fertilization, where the kids are conceived in a petri dish and the fertilized egg is implanted in the mom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC