Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Randi did a good job with that freeper, deflecting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:58 PM
Original message
Randi did a good job with that freeper, deflecting
his "they didn't lie" and "Saddam gassed his own people" lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did Randi tell him that we gave Saddam the gas he used on
his people???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. She did. :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. woohoo....I think she could go one on one with
Hopehead at EIB and steal his ratings...she is to freaking good!!!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thought she should have mentioned, too, that --
-- it was widely reported that the WMD sold to Saddam by the U.S. in 1988 outlived its shelf life by 2003 -- so that idiot trying to reference it to prove that there was some WMD in Iraq still didn't have a leg to stand on. -- And you know what, he sounded of enlistment age. Wonder what he's still doing here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Why not post about that at her message board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Good idea. Created a board account but there's a waiting period to post --
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 05:22 PM by quiet.american
Here's a link, though, referencing the weapons shelf life if anyone wants to post it over there--

http://www.alternet.org/story/15854 /

Strangely, the U.S. media have, with almost no exceptions, failed to mention that most bio/chemical agents have a rather limited shelf life. The few who do usually quote Scott Ritter, former UN Iraqi weapons inspector and controversial opponent of Dubya’s drive to Baghdad.

According to Ritter, the chemical weapons which Iraq has been known to possess -- nerve agents like sarin and tabun -- have a shelf life of five years, VX just a bit longer. Saddam's major bio weapons are hardly any better; botulinum toxin is potent for about three years, and liquid anthrax about the same (under the right conditions). And he adds that since all chemical weapons were made in Iraq's only chemical weapons complex – the Muthanna State establishment, which was blown up during the first Gulf War in 1991 -- and all biological weapons plants and research papers were clearly destroyed by 1998, any remaining bio/chemical weapons stores are now “harmless, useless goo.”

However, others have questioned Ritter’s veracity. A former hawk keen on an Iraq invasion after the first Gulf War, as recently as 1998 he wrote in an article for the New Republic that Saddam may have successfully hidden everything from potent biological and chemical agents to his "entire nuclear weapons infrastructure" from UN inspectors.

But the truth of the matter is that Iraq’s WMD may have even less of a shelf life than Ritter now claims -- and the U.S. government knows it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is one of her greatest strengths
I've griped about Randi on occasion. But dealing with freeps is one of her gifts. I hope more call her and get on the air. Like Bernie Ward, she has her unique way of dealing with them. She uses facts they can't deny and she builds in strength as the phone call proceeds. I'm sorry I didn't hear this particular call!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. He used the old freeper smokescreen.
"I listen to conservative voices and everyone else..."

Then launched into the standard talking points. Randi (no I love YOU more) laid out the facts and he went off on the "well yes but" dodges, and she would have none of it.

Go Randi!!!! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. And she came back from the commercial break
With a series of recordings of administration voices (from a DVD?) lying their corrupt asses off, overpromising, overstating, contradicting, and basically showing the little freep caller that he was full of shit. Too bad he's not on the line anymore, probably too busy jacking off because he talked to an actual woman on the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. *lol*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. LOL... very funny!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC