Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 'Noble Cause'...Here is why Casey Sheehan had to die.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:03 PM
Original message
The 'Noble Cause'...Here is why Casey Sheehan had to die.
Casey Sheehan and over eighteen hundred other Americans have died--according to Mr Bush-- for the 'Noble Cause" of creating a new, free Iraq. However, in dealing with the Bush Administration's NeoCon ideologues it is absolutely necessary to LOOK AT WHAT THEY ARE DOING IN IRAQ...NOT WHAT THEY SAY THEY ARE DOING IN IRAQ.

For those of us in the 'reality based community', here is a minute sampling of some of the laws being imposed on the Iraqi people by Bush, Paul Bremer and the American occupiers:

BREMER'S PUBLIC ORDER # 1:

Once the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority
(CPA) took power in Baghdad in March of 2003, it began enforcing a 1987 law
banning unions in public enterprises, where most Iraqis are employed. On top of
this, CPA head Paul Bremer added Public Order #1, banning pronouncements that
incite civil disorder, rioting, or damage to property. The phrase civil
disorder can easily apply to organizing strikes, and leaders of both the Iraqi
Federation of Trade Unions (IFTU) and Iraqs Union of the Unemployed have been
detained a number of times.
<snip>

Much of the CPA's effort in Baghdad was devoted to helping create a conservative's ideal state, complete with a 15 percent flat tax on individual and corporate income. Bremer's crew was so zealous that they tried, in September 2003, to privatize virtually the whole economy—200 state-owned firms. Legalizing labor unions would not have been helpful, to say the least, to these privatization plans. As Bjorn Brandtzaeg, a former CPA team leader for trade and industry, wrote in the Financial Times, “Instead of focusing on restarting the main industrial complexes as soon as possible after the end of hostilities, a team of ideologically motivated CPA officials with close ties to the US administration pursued a narrow privatization strategy.

<snip>

The U.S. government further signaled its attitude towards Iraqi labor unions in early December 2003 when coalition troops stormed the IFTU headquarters in Baghdad, ransacked their offices, arrested eight union workers, and shut down the office. Within a day, the arrested were released uncharged from Al Muthan airbase, but IFTU headquarters remained shut for seven months. The jailed men accused the United States of relying on information provided by a member of Saddam's old regime, Abdullah Murad Ghny, who owns a major private transport company whose workers had begun to organize.
<snip>

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0504.harwood.html

http://www.billybragg.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=1557

BREMER'S PUBLIC ORDER # 81:

Buried deep among the Bremer laws was Order 81, ‘Patent, Industrial Design, Undisclosed Information, Integrated Circuits and Plant Variety Law’.

At the heart of Order 81 was the Plant Variety Protection (PVP) provision. Order 81, states: ‘Farmers shall be prohibited from re-using seeds of protected varieties or any variety mentioned in items 1 and 2 of paragraph (C) of Article 14 of this Chapter.’

In plain English, this gives holders of patents on certain plant varieties, i.e. large foreign multinationals, absolute rights for 20 years over use of their seeds in Iraqi agriculture. The protected plant varieties are Genetically Modified or Gene Manipulated (GM) plants, and an Iraqi farmer who chose to plant such seeds must sign an agreement with the seed company holding the patent that he would pay a ‘technology fee’ and an annual license fee for planting the patented seeds.

Any Iraqi farmer seeking to take a portion of those patented seeds to replant in following harvest years would be subject to heavy fines from the seed supplier. Iraqi farmers would become vassals, not of Saddam Hussein, but of multinational GM seed giants.
Iraqi seed treasure destroyed.
<snip>
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/58773

BREMMER'S PUBLIC ORDER # 39:

Order No. 39 allows for: (1) privatization of Iraq's 200 state-owned enterprises; (2) 100% foreign ownership of Iraqi businesses; (3) 'national treatment' - which means no preferences for local over foreign businesses; (4) unrestricted, tax-free remittance of all profits and other funds; and (5) 40-year ownership licenses", wrote Antonia Juhasz, a project director at the International Forum on Globalization in San Francisco (LATimes, August 05, 2004).

Antonia Juhasz added; "Orders No. 57 and No. 77 ensure the implementation of the orders by placing U.S.-appointed auditors and inspector generals in every government ministry, with five-year terms and with sweeping authority over contracts, programs, employees and regulations". "Order No. 17 grants foreign contractors, including private security firms, full immunity from Iraq's laws. Even if they, say, kill someone or cause an environmental disaster, the injured party cannot turn to the Iraqi legal system. Rather, the charges must be brought to U.S. courts". <snip>

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/HAS504A.html

Once, again, this is a mere sampling of just a few of the laws which represent the NeoCon vision of the new, free Iraq; the Iraq for which Casey Sheehan and 1800 other heros have given their lives.

Cindy...this is why the President refuses to meet with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey... .as a relative of mine said..... "The Marshall Plan worked
just fine for Japan and Europe." Is he right? Is there a difference between what happened with the Marshall Plan and the financial and economic rape we are seeing with Bremer's "rules" and what the Marshall Plan did for Europe and Japan?? I really find it hard to believe that there is any resemblance between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC