Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean on Iraq: "We need to leave."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:23 PM
Original message
Dean on Iraq: "We need to leave."

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/face_81405.pdf

Face the Nation (CBS News) - Sunday, August 14, 2005

SCHIEFFER: Well, when you say, `We need to have a plan,' you mean a plan to leave?

Dr. DEAN: We do.

SCHIEFFER: A plan to get out?

Dr. DEAN: We need to have a plan to leave.

SCHIEFFER: Should we leave now?


Dr. DEAN: I think that's going to be very problematic. I mean, I think we've gotten in there, we've made a huge mess in there, we've created a terrorist danger for the United States where one did not exist before. But to pull out before they even have a chance to write their constitution I think is wrong. But I do think that time is coming very quickly. And if it turns out that this constitution really does take away the rights that women have enjoyed in Iraq
before, then I can't imagine why we're there.

SCHIEFFER: Well, I'll go back and ask you about that in a minute, but I know the president said, and I think it was just this week, giving a timetable for leaving Iraq would be the worst thing we could do because it would just tell the people who oppose us there, `Look, all we have to do is hang in till they leave, and then we're OK.'

Dr. DEAN: We need to leave. We're not going to be there forever, I hope. We're not going to be there forever. So the question is: What is a reasonable way to get out? And that's--we have no answers from the president on that at all. He keeps saying--well, his administration appears to be divided. Some of the generals have said, `Well, we can withdraw some of the troops, perhaps as many as 30,000, after the elections.' We have others saying, `Well, we're not going
to leave.' These people do not know what they're doing. They didn't know what they were doing when we got in, they had no plan then. They have no plan now. They do not know what they're doing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ironman202 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. don't be fooled, * is looking for the first opportunity to cut and run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I believe you are wrong
the plan is to pull out a few thousand troops but leave 60,000 or so behind at our enduring bases. It will be strategic for the Iran war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That IS the plan. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironman202 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. that may have been the "plan"
but the insurgency didn't play along. As soon as they can prop some dumb motherfucker up there, you'll start hearing shit like "The Iraqis will never stand up on their own with the US there propping them up, so we're going."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I think this is why they are moving so fast
with the Constiution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:57 PM
Original message
I wish you were right. And it is logical
But logic plays no part in the neo-con fantasies. I still believe as long as bush/cheney is in power there will be enduring bases and communication systems and US troops in the thousands in Iraq. With the blessings of the US/Iraqi constitution and our US installed pupptes.

Yes, lives will be lost in the hundreds of thousands over the next several years defending the US positions but that has not stopped them yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. dupe
Edited on Mon Aug-15-05 03:58 PM by leftchick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Sadly, I think you're right.
We will never be able to totally withdraw our troops as long as there is a neo-con anywhere within 1,000 miles of the White House. bush will NEVER agree to totally withdraw our troops, it just won;t happen. Until he's gone, we're stuck there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Probably
Why else did they start building the bases before we "officially" went into Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironman202 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. go here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Look at spring 2006
Declare victory (see "Mission Accomplished") and make a big show. Of course the Iraqi's will be rejoicing of our leaving but they'll find a way to twist it for Bush's approval raitings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. "They have no plan now. They do not know what they're doing."
Sad, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Their only plan was to say whatever they had to, to get there ...
... there never was an intention of 'leaving'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. I only wish all Democrats would drop the "WE" crap. WE didn't mess
up anything, bush* did. bush* created a terrorist danger for the US where there wasn't one before.

Give em hell Howard, and a little more truth, replace the "we" with bush*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I think Dean does make the distinction
between the "they" who got us into the mess and the "we" who got stuck in it. When he says "We need to leave," it seems to me, he's expressing solidarity with the soldiers and their families who (unlike the neo-cons who never set foot in Iraq) are over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC