KarenInMA
(821 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:20 PM
Original message |
|
Cindy Sheehan is not running for office. She's not nominated for SCOTUS, ambassador, or postmaster general. THEREFORE, when you start whining about her "credibility" or her divorce, or her sponsors, or the things she's said once upon a time, remember: She doesn't care what you think.
Really, do you think smearing her is going to hurt her more than the loss of her son? Do you think if enough rabid talk show attack dogs say mean things about her, she'll go home?
She's not John Kerry. She doesn't care about you. She only wants to talk to one guy, and he's not saying anything.
|
MissB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Dear Right Wing: Fuck off.
|
Catholic Sensation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
2. the question i have is |
|
do all of her supporters want that "one guy" to talk to her or keep ignoring her? there was a poll on here that had somewhat telling results.
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. What poll is that? Linky? |
|
I don't as a rule do the du polls.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I really want him to talk to her |
|
I want to know how he would answer her. Those words and thoughts would be very important. You now it would be lame. Cindy has a lot of credibility so she would relate their conversation accurately. I think that would help the movement to end the war. Just my 2¢.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
emdee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Perhaps you could recommend yours.... |
|
well, never mind, he's not doing too good of a job with you. LOL emdee
|
KarenInMA
(821 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I like how you put her name in quotes. Do you think that's a fake |
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
We've already won.
So, what do YOU think?
|
ktowntennesseedem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-15-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
6. But all the RW is capable of doing is smearing. |
|
If you disagree with them, even on fine points, they will attack you with false allegations and repeat them until they stick. Doing so accomplishes three things:
It makes them look better in their own eyes by putting down everyone else.
It instills simpler and more easily remembered talking points to their kool-aide guzzling supporters.
And most importantly, it spares them from having to actually DEBATE the issues. Attack and smear your opponents, which takes them off-topic and makes them go on defense, and you never have to explain yourself.
What they don't understand, and what you point out, is that this method doesn't work so well on someone who isn't really an opponent, just a grieving mom asking a simple question.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message |