annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 05:45 AM
Original message |
Why is CBS tickling "able danger" story? |
|
They are keeping this alive for some reason. I'm still confused about the implications. Is this an attempt to foist 9-11 off onto Clinton or will it lead to something real?
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 06:01 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Well, I don't know how the 9-11 Commission's negligence to look |
|
into the matter can be considered a flaw of the previous Administration? I think the key is the right-wing shill who was put on the Commission, and who may have been responsible for stifling important information -- like Able Danger.
You have to remember that there was an appropriate transition of power in January 2001. Richard Clarke wrote about how the Bush Administration was properly apprised of the "terrorist" situation in his book, "Against All Enemies." The administration responded by demoting his position and delegating everything to Cheney. And Cheney had his own agenda.
I still believe that in those energy meetings, you'll find a clue as to why the WTC was attacked in the first place, though I think by now it's obvious that it's during these transitions of power where we seem to be the weakest.
|
burythehatchet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Kissinger would have proud |
Last Lemming
(806 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. well they just had Shaffer on .. |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 06:17 AM by annabanana
And he is insisting that the DOD is "determined to get to the bottOm of this"
So Is DOD only going to gt to where the info wasn't transmitted, and ignore that Clarke was shouting and pleading for a meeting with Rice and NEVER GOT ONE??
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Sibel Edmonds hinted that the state Dept. is not to be trusted. |
|
Connect the dots. Any government agency who blinks at this point, probably has some paper shredding to do.
|
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. If the Commisision "swore" their witnesses" Then this |
|
Coud be leading to perjury indictment If the sworn officials knew that able danger was tracking atta and otheres and failed to diclose such information whene asked if anyone had any prior knowledge about Atts...Game is over.
Obstruction....Perjury
See its not that they even knew. It this whole thing of the Bushies being unable to afmit they made a mistake. The fact that they were bit tracking Atta is understqndable and even foregivable, Its the lying about it that is unconscionable,
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 06:19 AM
Response to Original message |
4. It's clearly partly that |
|
What I don't understand is why they feel defensive about it all of a sudden - unless this is just another pathetic attempt to change the discourse. Bryant Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
|
markus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-17-05 07:19 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Rush is alreadyon this one: yes, it's the Clenis |
|
who put in place the wall that could have prevented 9-11. Oh, and while we're we're on the subject, he dredged up Clinton Administration "failures" on the Millenium Bomber to prove it was all of a piece.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |