Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Family Council" thanks Bush for calling a HALT to XXX internets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:19 PM
Original message
"Family Council" thanks Bush for calling a HALT to XXX internets
Because, after all, ".xxx" would be too easy for parents to block, but just the very idea! Mercy! Also, pay no attention to that pesky war going on when this crucial issue is brewing. (PS, is the President "legislating from the Executive office?" Activist President!)

===

To: National Desk

Contact: Amber Hildebrand, 202-393-2100, For Radio, J.P. Duffy, both of the Family Research Council

WASHINGTON, Aug. 17 /Christian Wire Service/-- The Family Research Council thanks President Bush for calling a halt to the '.XXX' domain. Patrick Trueman, FRC's senior legal counsel and former chief of the U.S. Department of Justice's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, released the following statement:

"Selling hard core pornography on the internet is a violation of federal obscenity law so the Bush Administration is right to oppose the '.XXX' domain. The Bush Administration should not, in any way, be seen to facilitate the porn industry which has been a plague on our society since the establishment of the internet. The '.XXX' domain proposal is an effort to pander to the porn industry and offers nothing but false hope to an American public which wants illegal pornographers prosecuted, not rewarded.

"The '.XXX' domain was never intended to force the porn industry to leave the '.com' domain, which has been a cash cow for pornographers. Indeed, any law attempting to force pornographers to relocate to '.XXX' would be constitutionally suspect and not likely to be effective. Instead, if the '.XXX' domain were established pornographers would keep their lucrative '.com' commercial sites and expand to even more sites on '.XXX, thus becoming even more of a menace to society. Pornography violates the dignity of the women and men involved, destroys marital bonds, and pollutes the minds of child and adult consumers.

"The Family Research Council supports Attorney General Gonzales' major new prosecution initiative against the porn industry, announced in May. We are confident of his determination and of his ultimate success. The pornographers, instead of expanding their presence on the internet, would be well advised to get out of business all together right now before they are called to court to answer for their crimes."

http://www.earnedmedia.org/frc0817.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. stupid
it would make filering the content a lot eaiser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. no kidding
Now kids can continue to accidentally go to whitehouse.com.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. go there now...
it is no longer a porn site...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. well, sure, you could filter XXX domains
but what about all the ones that DON'T go that route. There would no legal requirement for them to be in the XXX domain...would there? Could there? And just who decides what is XXX and what isn't? You know someone is going to get pissed that a nipple is shown on some website for breast cancer self exams and demand that it be rated XXX.

Just one more top level domain ... and one the most of the porn business would likely stay out of for exactly the reason you list.

SubjectProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. no but it would still make it easier to catch the bulk of the content
in one fell swoop. and i don't think the porn industry has any particular reason to prevent their content from being filtered, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. mail from domains with XXX
for one. And, I believe many of them would not want to be so easily blocked by simple filters...as a matter of fact, based on local obscenity laws a state could too easily block ALL XXX...I don't think the porn guys/gals will go for that.

SubjectProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. But you're expecting them to be thinking
Of course if all porn was sent to one domain you'd be able to just block those sites. The world of the internet would be blissfully separated by content allowing adults to see what they CLEARLY WANT TO SEE and then others and children can just shut all of that out. I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to filter all of that porn spam based on this- the possibilities are endless. Finally a solution for everyone no? But of course it isn't about choice. They want to abolish anyone else's choice which isn't exactly like theirs. Bush is shamelessly computer illiterate but his opinion is valid on this? Puh-leeze. Instead of dealing with the issue that different strokes for different folks, you know humanity and our basic animal/sexual nature, they want to abolish that nature. What's next abolish non-procreative sex? What's to stop them? Scary naked people must be destroyed. :saracasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. so, do you think pornographers would go willingly
into the XXX domain? There is NO WAY that they would...

SubjectProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. If it meant a world where they can live in peace from these people?
maybe. The whole concept of if they had another domain they would spread is so ignorant. There is no limit to the # of sites one can have so they can spread all over the dot-com universe as it is now. If porn providers who are under assault knew that the issue of content was not under attack in the XXX world but they could get raided and seized and whatever other fascist tactics DOJ has in store for them in the coming Theocracy wouldn't it be ok to be safe with a new domain? HBO shows boobies FoodTV or basic cable does not. One domains indecent can be another domains god-given right. As it stands now TV can be filtered and content can be completely blocked with V-Chips ratings and cable box lists and locks if only people used them. There would be a transitional time for .com sites to go to .xxx. Servers have for years had the ability to simply redirect traffic to another site from one address (the dot-com one in this case.) Throw in a pop-up reminder for their customers to change their bookmark and the transition is complete. If you are a porn fan, you would be aware of the change and adjust your surfing accordingly grateful that fundamentalists can't control what you do in your own home. Yet.

Clearly by fighting the new domain they reveal their agenda is not about preventing access to children or others offended but to abolish the content that they disagree with entirely. So they champion the activist President for giving the finger to the First Ammendment yet again. God bless America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I agree with you...
I just think the XXX domain would end up being a waste of time and resources. There is no need for it now...that is my only objection.

SubjectProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Plus think of how easy it will be for Mrs.Pompousasschristian to search
for it. Sometimes Mr.Pompousasschristian doesn't "Clean up" as well as he should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. These people are firmly entrenched in the 13th Century. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironman202 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. i thin there might be a milimeter or two
left in Bush's ass for them to crawl up. When he yawns, you can see them looking out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey wait a minute
"The '.XXX' domain proposal is an effort to pander to the porn industry and offers nothing but false hope to an American public which wants illegal pornographers prosecuted, not rewarded."

I don't agree with that statement at all :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. We are not Americans to them, you forgot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. ye gods that photo gives me the creeps...
And like there isnt already porn on the net..

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC