Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Best of Luck to Cindy (Conyers Blog)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 09:59 PM
Original message
Best of Luck to Cindy (Conyers Blog)
www.conyersblog.us

Best Of Luck To Cindy
Other Developments

First off, let me offer my best wishes to Cindy Sheehan and her family as she goes to be with her mother during her illness. The last thing Cindy needed after right wingers like Rush Limbaugh dismissed the loss of her son, was her mother suffering a stroke. But Cindy is a strong resolute woman, and if her mother is anything like her, I'm sure she will come through with flying colors.

Two interesting pieces in today's New York Times. First, a front page article entitled "Bad Iraq War News has some in GOP Worried Over '06 Vote." The article lays out a case for GOP concerns, but unfortunately offers far too much in the way of Republican spin. For example, Adam Nagourney and David Kirkpatrick write, "Some said that the perception that the war was faltering was providing a rallying point for dispirited Democrats and could pose problems for Republicans in the Congressional elections next year." How does one of the worst justified and conceived wars in our nation's history come seen as merely a "perception" that it is faltering? The many families who have lost loved ones and still can't get decent body armour will tell you it is far more than a perception. Also, I can tell you first hand, Democrats are not "dispirited" -- we have lost some battles, but if anything we are energized by the GOP excesses and corruption we see every day in Washington.

Moreover, after laying out numerous problems for the GOP, the authors out of the blue add, "Given the speed with which public opinion has shifted over the course of the war and the size of the Republican majority in the Senate and House, no one has gone so far as to suggest that war policy could return Democrats to power in the House or the Senate." Really? If no one has suggested, let me be the first to suggest it -- the Republicans are at risk of losing their majority. We need to pick up less than 20 seats in the House, or less than the average historical loss during the midterm of a second presidential term. With regard to the "speed" of public opinion, the authors neglect the fact that while public opinion moves fast, since the start of the war, the direction of the opinion has been pretty much downward. And of course, this doesn't even take into account the way Bush and the GOP have messed up the economy, blown up the deficit, ignored the middle class, intruded in people's private lives, etc. etc.

Bob Herbert writes an excellent column today, entitled "Blood Runs Red, Not Blue." He poses the same poignant question Michael Moore asked in Farenheit 911 and Cindy Sheehan posed when she asked why no one in the president's family had enlisted. That is, "If the war in Iraq is worth fighting - if it's a noble venture, as the hawks insist it is - then it's worth fighting with the children of the privileged classes. They should be added to the combat mix. If it's not worth their blood, then we should bring the other troops home." I have yet to hear a cogent response to this question.

BTW, my letter with Maurice Hinchey asking for a review of Ashcroft's handling of the treasongate case received some more coverage. In addition to Rawstory's article yesterday, it was also picked up by Bradblog and Democracy Now. My interview on this topic this morning with Amy Goodman on Pacifica is also posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting - nominated
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 10:01 PM by Hissyspit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I really want this man in the White House
He's honest, compassionate, intelligent ... and HE CARES what happens to this country and the people in it - not just "the people" as a whole, but each individual person. He also listens, reads and is willing to learn which, as the last 4 1/2 years have taught us, are VERY important qualities for a President to have. If I had to pick one word to describe him, it would probably be "integrity"

Mr. Conyers ... you're the best! :patriot: :loveya:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC