LuckyTheDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:16 PM
Original message |
|
It sure as heck seems like the only winners in the whole Iraq fiasco so far have been the Iranians, whose regime now will have a very friendly neighbor with similar goals. Gee, good work, GW.
:spank:
|
Zenlitened
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Definitely seems like a possibilty. |
|
Whatever became of reports that Chalabi was spying for Iran? Did the Bush-bots just clamp their hands over their ears and pretend not hear, or did they come up with a way to white-wash that, too?
:shrug:
|
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Yes, and there is Chalabi as part of Iraq's governing council |
|
his lies were all over the CNN show last night and yet...
|
knowbody0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
LuckyTheDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. It's funny you mention a new name. I've been expecting a name change |
|
is in the works so bush* doesn't have to talk about war in iraq anymore. My guess is maybe they go back to Persia.
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
4. ...and Halliburton and Dick Cheney |
Kolesar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. That's my best guess why the republicans invaded Iraq |
|
Second guess would be that it would be a devastating campaign issue to divide and attack the Democrats with. That is not a compelling enough reason, though.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message |