Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 09:49 PM
Original message |
Great NYT coverage of evolution debate |
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
henslee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They want you to pay for Krugman extract that is only two wks old? |
|
Am I mistaken? That article must be somewhere else. I will find and link.
|
Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
henslee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Our secret. That last paragraph is the kicker... |
|
.....like supply-side economics or global-warming skepticism, intelligent design doesn't have to attract significant support from actual researchers to be effective. All it has to do is create confusion, to make it seem as if there really is a controversy about the validity of evolutionary theory.
Real scientists HAVE TO BE taking out ads in the NYT over this. This is ridiculous.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |