Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 12:52 PM
Original message |
Ayn Rand? Are her works still relevant in 2005? |
|
In 1940, she may have had a point.
But time changes and I believe her works are way out of touch with reality. Not in the current political "playing field" (and it's no game, rest assured...)
|
MrBenchley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. She wasn't all that relevant in 1940, for that matter.... |
|
Her books are lame as fiction and even lamer as philosophy...
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I know a guy who thinks her works are the greatest. |
|
I'm not quite sure WHAT to say to hm, except for possibly "prepare for a shock".
|
MrBenchley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. It's for the sort of person |
|
who can't face up to the brutal realism of Star Trek but still wants to act like a childish fool in public...
|
leveymg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
27. Alan Greenspan is a big Rand fan and looks like a frog. |
|
Just thought you'd like to know. :+
|
Ladyhawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
31. My brother is HEAVILY into Ayn Rand. |
|
He thinks greed and selfishness are virtues.
|
Kolesar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Would rather read about frogs or engine repair, myself |
Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. only if you want to be a dick for your whole life nt |
ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Wouldn't she have had to have been "relevant" to be considered |
comsymp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
With her seething hatred of anything to the left of Father Coughlin, combined with a writing style that ran the gamut from mediocre to piss-poor, she came across to me as a slightly sane version of Coulter.
|
JAbuchan08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I haven't read it myself |
|
but a friend told me she disliked it as a novel. The motivations of the evil industrial regulators were apparently absolutely insane and completely unbelievable. Like I said I haven't read it. I sort of don't want to.
|
newscott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
Mairead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I certainly don't think so. Nor were they ever. |
|
For all her hatred of Soviet Communism, a film of her work would have to be made in 'Soviet Realism' style, because she posterised everything.
|
Generic Other
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
9. NO, not for anyone but Karl Rove |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 01:02 PM by Generic Other
And he's not one of Rand's "ubermen." Just a wannabee.
|
Another Bill C.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I read all of Ayn Rand's books. I really bought into the "virtue of selfishness" and practiced it to the best of my ability. Eventually and unlike the characters in her books, I married, I had children, I was widowed and dependent on the charity of others, I lived among other cultures, I grew up, and the revelation that Ayn Rand was full of shit settled upon me.
In Ayn Rand's world, there are no children and consequently no future.
|
Mairead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. "In Ayn Rand's world, there are no children" |
|
Are you sure? I'd more say that they're all children, pretending to be grown-up without understanding that there's more to it than wearing daddy's and mommy's clothing.
|
Ladyhawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
32. Thanks for that. My brother is 42 and still believes in Rand. n/t |
jane_pippin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
11. She's relevant in that "I need to write an essay about Atlas Shrugged or |
|
I'll never get into college" kind of way.
|
hatrack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Sucked then, suck now |
|
Will continue to suck for as long as books, libraries and literacy exist.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Her writing really sucks. nt |
MrBenchley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. You got that right.... |
|
"Atlas Shrugged" is half-assed pompous drivel....
|
back2basics909
(438 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
.. if only because the younger conservatives we are seeing now, the economic conservatives are reading from her Hymn book, so to speak. They are Neo-Rands IMO.
|
MrBenchley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
It mostly appeals to an adolescent and selfish person....
|
Midlodemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I had to read that drivel in college. |
|
She sucked then and she sucks now.
|
eyepaddle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. That's just begging for a lounge response! |
|
But seriously, her only work I read was "Atlas Shrugged." A terrible book Boring as hell, cartoonishly simple in its characterizations. Oddly enough I respe ted the roffessor who assigned it, but I sure looked at him differently after I read (most of) that book.
It was so grindingly dull I gave up 80% of the way through and took my chances on the test.
|
Syncronaut Seven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Atlas Shrugged is not a children's book, that's for sure. |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 01:20 PM by Syncronaut Seven
I very much enjoyed the book as a piece of fiction, As a manifesto it sucked!
I would not recommend it to the weak minded or those prone to fascist thinking. I was able to take it apart and recognize it as sort of an pro business, anti labor, hyper-libertarian indoctrination for tender young minds.
The book is not benign, however if your thoughtful, intelligent and aware you might enjoy it. I've found it invaluable in helping to understand the current paradigm, sort of an early PNAC in many ways.
Of course Robert Anton Wilson has also helped me understand my world, and he's VERY entertaining. O8) :evilgrin:
|
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
44. Yes, I far preferred "Telemachus Sneezed" |
AlienGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
48. Robert Anton Wilson is far more relevant |
|
Also more fun to read, and probably a lot more fun at parties.
Tucker
|
NoPasaran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Some of her weightier tomes still make excellent doorstops n/t |
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Soap operas for wannabee rightwing "intellectuals". |
|
As little of her writing as I could stomach reminded me of the torn bodice writings so beloved of frustrated housewives. Except the knight in shining armor is replaced with a "rugged individualist" with a brief case.
|
comsymp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
Bodice rippers featuring singularly unpleasant, selfish characters.
|
Syncronaut Seven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. Oh yea, and there was that part of it |
|
It was a long book, I forgot about the "take me now! No no stop.... we mustn't!" part of it.
The book took a lot of heat for romantasizing several sexist themes. Heinlein was criticized for writing that some perceived as sexist, I'm not a sexist, yet I enjoyed Heinlein immensly.
You do have to look at Rand as sort of a pathology, You can't deny the fact that she was clearly insane.
|
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Considering Alan Greenspan sat at her feet, Yes. n/t |
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
29. As relevant as it ever was. |
|
Meaning only as a demonstration of right wing propaganda.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Greenspon sat at her feet as a lad. Probably washed them too! |
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message |
33. **Chichiri stands on one foot** |
|
Objectivism is Scientology for atheists.
|
jonnyblitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. LOL....that was a good one. nt |
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
51. I wondered if anyone would actually get that. |
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
BiggJawn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
35. I tried to read "The Fountainhead". |
|
thankfully, I bought it for a dime at a used book sale, so it was no great loss as I fed it to the shredder. Made it to page 90, I think...
And lest you think me a mouth-breathing Philistine, I tackled Chaucer's "Canterbury tales" IN THE ORIGINAL until I LEARNED that strange tongue.
Sure would like to get into some "Swiving" right about now....
|
fauxpolitico
(23 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Definitely Irrelevent |
|
Required reading for me in college. That drivel nearly had me vomiting.
|
OrlandoGator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
37. It's essential reading for self-centered assholes. |
|
No, Rand is not relevant. Greed is not a virtue.
|
Must_B_Free
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
38. left her husband to have an affair with a young fan |
|
righties can't keeps their privates private.
|
kitkat65
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
39. A college friend of mine worked at the university's library. |
|
He told me Ayn Rand books were the most vandalized books on the floor he worked . . . usually via a toilet flushing.
|
really annoyed
(650 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Her works were never relevant. |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 11:58 PM by really annoyed
Just my opinion though.....
I know the libertarians are crazy about her. So, she is relevant to some people.
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |
41. Alice Rosenbaum was a talentless, tin-eared lunatic then.... |
|
she's a talentless, tin-eared lunatic now.
|
kestrel91316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
42. Isn't she dead by now?? |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
45. Mercifully so...and her writing has always smelled that way |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Ask some of her Zombies |
|
Since I'm not part of the cult, I'm really not qualified to make that call.
|
mixedview
(206 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |
46. As a libertarian I agree with her main ideas |
|
which are essentially the classical liberal principles of the Enlightenment and of our founding fathers - that a free nation begins and ends with the individual.. that a great, strong, wealthy nation harnesses the power of the individual - the power of the human desire to improve oneself and the world around him/her. All of the great things we enjoy: democracy, a free and open culture, higher standards of living, education, technology, innovation, - all the results of this belief system.
As a moderate I agree with many mainstream liberal positions re. gov't intervention to prevent market failure, to manage/build the spaces we all share (the commons), to maintain a social safety net. But I see democratic socialism as a mechanism to save capitalism/liberty from itself - not to replace it.. to help stabilize and expand capitalism and opportunity to as many people as possible.
I should point out that a few years ago I was more of a liberal, and evolved to this position from that one. I've come to this position through much thought and debate, not just because I read some Rand.
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
53. Thats like saying "As a chicken, I agree with Col. Sanders main ideas." |
|
No, her works are not in any way in line with enlightenment thinking, they are in fact an assault on enlightenment thinking.
Objectivism is to libertarianism as Intelligent Design is to evolution.
|
Technowitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message |
47. Seems almost every intellectual -- myself included -- goes through... |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 12:13 AM by Technowitch
...a Randian phase at some point in one's early adult life. Something about the hyper-rationality and passionless "enlightened" self-interest is appealing.
As with many utopianists, she wrote her fiction to promulgate her philosophy -- and used the narrative itself to 'prove' it would work.
Meanwhile, in the real world, some of us like to take care of the weak. To enforce pollution laws, because the environment affects everybody. And not everybody behaves in a rational, dispassionless manner.
As for her works, I think they were a reaction to the rise of social responsibility -- and FDR's "New Deal" programs in the '30s. People like Rand feared socialism, and so came up with its polar opposite: the capitalists' paradise. One wherein anybody could enter into any agreement they liked, where resources were there for whomever could get at them first, and where the environment really needn't be worried about.
Her philosophies were as blind to actual human nature as communism was. But that doesn't stop people from falling for what she (and her followers) are selling.
One day though, I woke up and realized, "Hey, I *am* my brother's keeper." (That is, one of the reasons I'm on this planet is to help people, even when it isn't in my own self-interest.)
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
50. That's because almost every intellectual is a teenager sometimes... |
|
I agree with the poster above who said that dear sweet Alice was essentially adolescent. And then we get smarter.
|
EnfantTerrible
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message |
49. She's a NeoCon wet dream... |
|
You have to be asleep to enjoy it and when you wake up you take a long, hot, shower and work through the shameful feelings.
|
txaslftist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
54. I can't believe your ignorance... |
|
... As I sit in my mountaintop retreat, high in the Colorado Rockies, built by the great railroad industrialists, we pity you poor 'takers' down below.
...not long from now, the deadly ray-beam weapons will blot you all out of existence, and we will remain, living by the principles of Ayn Rand, bartering our self-minted gold coins and rebuilding the world you pitiable fools have driven into the dark ages.
...by not following our principles since the 1940s, look how technological progress has been stifled. Why, there has been no significant advancement in any of the important fields of industry, commerce, medicine, or astrology at all.
...but our day is coming. Prometheus will rise anew, for the great spirit of enterprise cannot be contained!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message |