HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 07:54 PM
Original message |
If we up and invaded the U.K. because many terrahists are/were |
|
there.... or whatever.... and if the people after 2 years of little electricity, water and streets with sewage got ticked and started fighting back against the occupation.... could we then refer to the Brits as terrorists too??? Huh george?? Huh??? Can we huh??? Twit.
|
Retired AF Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Who will arm the Brits? |
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Mmmmmmm....... let me ponder..... oh wait!! |
Retired AF Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Not talking about their military |
|
which uses mostly non US arms anyway. In order for this scenario to happen the general population would have to be armed or have access to arms. England being an island it would be a lot easier to keep weapons from coming in which is darn near impossible in Iraq.
|
jwirr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Yeah, wasn't bushies reason for invading the two |
|
countries in the middle east because they harbored terrorists?
|
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-23-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. That's what I heard.... but in Iraq, we had alot of harbors with few |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |