Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deadly Daddy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:49 AM
Original message
Deadly Daddy?

David Hendricks sobs at funeral services for his family in 1983. His wife, Susan (below, right), and kids — Rebekah (below, rear), Grace and Ben — were all found hacked to death in their beds. Hendricks was found guilty but later cleared in the killings.
It was dad's night to watch the kids, so on the evening of Nov. 7, 1983, David Hendricks, 29, bundled his brood into the car for a treat - dinner at the Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theater in Bloomington, Ill.

---

In the eyes of detectives, this all seemed too calm, too accepting for a man whose entire family had just been wiped out by an ax murderer, wrote Steve Vogel in his book on the case, "Reasonable Doubt."

Hendricks noted that police said the killer was probably a burglar, giving details he could not possibly have known unless he had been inside the house. But the crime scene had been sealed off, even to Hendricks.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime_file/story/339080p-289568c.html


This fellow sure looks guilty to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I sure ain't letting you on any of my juries, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I will never serve on a jury, worry not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That felony conviction slow you down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Even the judge in the FIRST case where he was found guilty...
... was not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. And said so.

There must be more to this for a judge to say that. I think you don't have the whole story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think he fooled them
Unless the facts presented are not the facts, I think he is
a world class 'salesman.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You are certainly welcome to that opinion, and you may be right..
... however, it takes more than suspicion, or even PROBABLILITY, to convict someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC