jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:02 PM
Original message |
What's the ulterior motive in closing these specific bases? |
|
I am referring to Fort McPherson, GA (headquarters, Forces Command--the largest maneuver command in the Army), Fort Monroe, VA (headquarters, Training and Doctrine Command--the largest major command in the Army) and Fort Monmouth, NJ (headquarters, Communications and Electronics Command).
Relocating these three major commands is going to cost us billions of dollars.
Is Shrub's hatred of blue states (New Jersey) and desire to kowtow to developers (Fort Monroe is on some very desirable land, and Fort McPherson is in the Atlanta area, where land is precious) so pervasive that he'll spend this much money-we-don't-have to do these things?
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Revenge of the Red States.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They also need to redirect funds to operate all those |
|
bases that are being built in the Middle East.
|
izzie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. That sounds about right |
|
No way does Bush save money. He is like the drunk sailor joke.
|
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. I found out where they're planning to move FORSCOM |
|
It was in the paper today: Right here at Fort Bragg.
If I was a heavy-unit commander, like maybe a colonel at Fort Hood, I'd be scared shitless about this development. The airborne is the "glory" part of the army. They get new equipment before anything else. They get as much training funding as they want. When the tankers in Europe were doing "tank training" by walking around in the woods going clank, clank (yes, they actually did this) because the Army didn't have any money to buy fuel, the paratroopers at Fort Bragg were still doing mass airborne assaults out of C-141s once a month.
And now they're going to get FORSCOM right where they want them...so they can sit there and go "you really should deactivate the armor divisions, their day is over, the future belongs to light, mobile airborne forces." And of course some dipshit at FORSCOM is going to believe that light, mobile airborne forces (who are presently getting the living shit kicked out of them because you need steel in vast quantities wrapped around your ass if you want to survive combat against an army your commander-in-chief pissed off by firing en masse, and a Hummer with an aluminum floor and three inches of sand in the wheelwells ain't got it) really are the way of the future and shortchange the heavy forces.
|
wli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. punishing Democrats and rewarding Republicans n/t |
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
5. remember he gave a speech with a flag with 28 stars behind him |
|
he's only concerned in achieving his global mission and he will sacrifice anything to do it.
|
Lexingtonian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The longer I've watched the process, the less I'm impressed there's much of a conspiracy there. I'm in the Northeast and I can't figure out why a whole lot of military bases should be here. As far as I can tell, the lot that is/was here was essentially sprawl to accommodate the huge Cold War military and waystation on the flyway to Western Europe.
Those big bases in the South are better suited for infantry training-they resemble wet Central Europe in the winters, the rest of the relevant armpits of the world during the rest of the year. San Diego and Newport are the logical, deep water, fleet ports. The Southwest and Great Basin deserts are the best place for air force training. The southern Californian coast and the Gulf coast resemble the places most amphibious landings would be like. If you have a small military (somewhere around 40% the size of the Cold War force) that's where it would logically go- into the southern half of the country.
It's time to let the Cold War be over.
|
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. the only objection I have to what you say is |
|
the only 2 places that have been attacked on U.S. soil in recent memory has been NY and DC, I remember there was something about the fact that they could not get the fighter jets to respond fast enough, I hate to think what would happen if they had to come from Atlanta and not NJ. After Iraq, I think there is more of a possibility for another terrorist strike in the Northeast.
|
Whoa_Nelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Another method of gerrymandering n/t |
merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-24-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message |
9. What's the property like? |
|
They are shutting down the Navy Home port in trent lott's home town, but I don't see it as shutting it down as much as vacating it for corporate development. The chamber of commerce/economic development folks didn't seem upset at all. They can sell the newly constructe buildings and land to cruise ships that are look for a deep port to utilize, to gaming interests (MS has gaming on the water), for oil/gas interests (big push to put rigs out in the Gulf.
The USofA (our tax dollars) just paid to have the area developed and the infrastructure put in place for the corporate interests :shrug:
|
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. they're also shutting down Walter Reed Hospital |
|
prime real estate in DC, what would a wounded soldier rather have a realtor or a good doctor. HMMM, that's a tough one, remember I don't speak republicanese.
|
merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. I saw that and wondered what could be their ulterior motives. |
|
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 11:17 PM by merh
So, Walter Reed site is prime real estate in DC. Gee, guess they need more office space in DC or condos or hotels.
:cry: Those wounded soldiers can get their care elsewhere. :argh:
:hi: It's good to see you Miss Waverly :hug:
|
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Good to see you as well, Merh |
|
I also wanted to mention that closing down Walter Reed is possible payback to DC, which is a democratic town. (They don't have representation in the Senate) but their mayor Anthony Williams is a democrat.
|
GreatCaesarsGhost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. they want to privatize military health care |
|
let the tax payers pay to consolidate it all and then sell it off
to haliburton.
|
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. Of course, Outsource it, the Republican answer to all problems |
|
Ding, Ding, you win the prize for an astute DU'er, I applaud your logic.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
damage "blue" communities
stupidity and incompetence
|
MGKrebs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I don't know why else they would want to close |
|
Ft. McPherson except to punish (Dem) Mayor Shirley Franklin. Georgia gets a net gain due to other moves (Repub Gov.).
And tell me saving Ellsworth over the Pentagons objection is not a gimme to Thune.
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Move the military away from DC in case of a nuclear attack <-------------- |
|
Edited on Fri Aug-26-05 04:41 PM by jsamuel
risk mitigation
if you notice, I will quote a Republican Senator...
"100 mile limit"
What is the radius of a nuclear explosion?
100 miles
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message |