Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm offended by the tombstone labels for a different reason

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:33 AM
Original message
I'm offended by the tombstone labels for a different reason
When you die in a war, they inscribe your monument with the name of the war that killed you. So all this freaking out about "Operation Iraqi Freedom" being put on the headstones is a bit strange; this is how they've always done it.

I am offended by the way they name wars now.

This "operation such-and-such" crap is something the Bush family started. George H.W. Bush, who was the first president since FDR to serve more than two terms, started the practice of naming wars the benign-sounding "operation" when we invaded Grenada. We called it Operation Urgent Fury.

We called the Panama invasion Operation Just Cause.

And so on. The first Gulf War was Desert Shield which became Desert Storm when the shooting started.

Now to the present. We're in two wars--Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (Iraq). The name "operation" seems to imply a quick, surgical function, not a bloody prolonged war that has killed 1900 of our own people.

If we called it "Iraq War" the American people would be 90 percent against it.

The headstones are fine. The "war" is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. "the first president since FDR to serve more than two terms"?
huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well who do you think is running the country today
Not that braindead offspring of his

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Dick Cheney is running the country today
Dick might have GHWB's help, but he's capable of running the nation all by himself. He doesn't need Shrub except for the fact that he'd still be running Halliburton on a full-time basis if he didn't have Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulGroom Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think he is referring to the widely held opinion
That Reagan was basically incapable of shopping off a grocery list for much of his presidency, much less running the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Ruffian Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Eisenhower ?
two terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Reagan Was a Vegetable Figurehead
GHW Bush was the man behind the curtains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Ronald Reagan was even more of a figurehead than Shrub is
At least Ronnie was a nice guy who could string coherent sentences together and made sense most of the time. Bush is a grade-A asshole who can't speak four sentences without butchering the English language at least five times.

Between 1981 and 1989, Reagan was the purported "president" but Bush 41 was really running the show. You know, kind of like it is now except that GHWB didn't have that snarl perfected the way Cheney does.

Then between 1989 and 1993, Bush was the man in the Oval Office.

Therefore, three terms--two as the man behind the curtain, one as full-blown president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. How quickly people forget
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 06:40 AM by China_cat
that the original name for 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' was Operation Iraqi Liberation. Which was truth in labeling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Kind of like "Desert Shield" became "Desert Storm"
We know it as "Gulf War One"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Operation" and "Freedom" mislabeling, and now it's with them forever
The use "operation" for a seven year occupation, and "freedom", well...

Now the tombstones will mock the dead forever, a Madison Avenue bit of false advertising put over the reality of death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe Bush War? My mother's brother has WW2
He is not in a federal Cem. if that has any thing to do with it. I think any one who was in the service can have a standard free stone. I know I am thinking of doing it for a man in my family that has no stone and was in the Civil war. I am told I can do it but looks like work and I may just try and get the Civil War buffs to do it.They have all the records as this man has been hard to find and that is where I found out a little on him and his grave. His name was on the Civil war stone in the middle of the town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Um.. thats the way it's been done as long as the family
agrees to it. The family has to sign off on the tombstone. They have 5 days after the funeral to submit any changes. The headstones are not "fine" if the family did not approve it. Believe me.. I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC