Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this true about the Reform Party?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sephirstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:30 AM
Original message
Is this true about the Reform Party?
At one point it had a Marxist faction (Dunno who ran the show...), a paleoconservative faction (Pat Buchanan), and paleolibertarian fcation (Ross Perot), and a left-libertarian faction (Jesse "The 'Mind'...lol" Ventura).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where did you get that?
Sounds about right, though. The Reform party, to me, seemed to be made up of people who didn't know very much but wanted to "play" politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. In election 2000 there was a big fight
John Haglin of the Natural Law Party against Pat Buchanan. It was a very hostile situation. The reform platform is broad enough to cover liberals or conservatives.

I am not up on the entire history of the Reform party however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's why political parties need real focus
...and why democracies require multiple parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Buchanan's job was to kill the Reform party
Perot started it and the Bushes (rightly) blamed Perot as a spoiler for Republicans. They sent in Buchanan to derail the party, and he did a bang up job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, it was shameful
I was looking at Haglin, and hoping he'd get the Reform nod... but it was pretty obvious Buchanan's motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I met Haglin once
Gave him and his VP candidate a ride in my taxicab back during the '92 election.

Did you ever read the platform of the Natural Law party? Quite the trip, actually. They seem to want to govern via a combination of quantum physics theories and Transcendental Yogic philosophy. I kid you not (at least that's what he was talking about in '92).

I'll be generous to him (since he gave me a good tip), and say that the Natural Law Party is a bit "before it's time."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So when 'maverick' Buchanan spouts about an 80-hr work week
...then you know what's going on.

"Oh, Congress wants to reduce overtime pay... Well at least its not that 80-hr week the ex-Republican was talking about."

Uh huh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im4edwards Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. sounds reasonable
the other major parties are little different so why should they be ?

The point of the reform party was to serve a populist theme for people fed up with the rampant corruption of the major parties. Thats going to draw a pretty mixed bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC