Halliburton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 07:56 PM
Original message |
Time Magazine tried to influence Election 2004 into Bush's favor |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No surprise. Hugh Sidey is a longtime Bush-family sycophant and cover up |
|
journalist from way back.
|
stepnw1f
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Not So "Odd" Anymore, Is It? (nt) |
orpupilofnature57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
3. MSM to the nth degree, Media more than the ? %, that hired him ,Twice |
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Actually they DID influence the election. They witheld information that |
|
would have made for a more informed citizenry, so their inaction = bush* support.
The claim to not want to influence an election is ridiculous, if they run the story, maybe it does, maybe it doesn't cost bush* some votes, but by NOT running it, it certainly HELPED bush* to not have to answer yet another scandal at a crucial point.
Time Magazine = Fuckers
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
5. TIME "SUCCEEDED" in influencing the election in Bush's favor |
wli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I'd boycott them, but I'm already boycotting the whole of the MSM. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message |