How about Hackett/Feingold for 2008

[shraby]

[sasha031]

1. How about

Feingold and Hackett in 2008

[shraby]

2. Either way. They're both straight shooters.

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

3. How about Boxer/Feingold.?

PS... I don't know what the great shakes is about Hackett. He has yet to impress me.

[shraby]

4. He says what he thinks. No sidestepping,

no splitting hairs, just straight talk.

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

6. Except I don't like the straight talk that is coming out of his mouth.

I watched him on Hardball. Here is my post from part of what I heard, and I didn't care one bit for it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=4459409&mesg_id=4459445

I also recall a tv debate when he was running for congress and he said that we were fighting in Iraq to keep us free. To me that is total Bullshit.

[Skink]

5. How about Reid/Hackett

They are already going after Reids so called condition because he would win and then start saying things like the Buck stops here.

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

7. I'm sorry but Reid is still too much towards the new Dem center for

my taste. His own personal anti-choice position doesn't please me either.

Boxer is Wonderful!

[ladjf]

10. "We don't need no stinking centrist".

[never_get_over_it]

12. I'm with you

Boxer and Feingold would be a great choice - as for Hackett maybe he needs to get a bit of experience in the political process before he runs for President of VP...and he hasn't impressed me that much either except I did love it when he called the freak in chief an ass hole or whatever it was he called him.....

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

13. He called ** a chickenhawk which was about the best thing that

I've heard Hackett say.

[FlemingsGhost]

8. Maybe THEY can win the next rigged election!

:eyes:

[Skink]

9. That is what I say. let's just hack back....

[autorank]

11. Better yet, Clark - Hackett (we get experience, 2 shit kickers, & OH)

Yehaaaaaaaaaaaa!