Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two things bother me concerning Lance Armstrong's interview

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:03 AM
Original message
Two things bother me concerning Lance Armstrong's interview
First, I need to say that I'm a big fan of Armstrong, and I hope these allegations are bull. Still, this all leaves me wondering.

I didn't see the Larry King interview live last night, but it was discussed on CNN Live this morning with Soledope O'brien and Carol Costello playing several clips of it.

1) Lance was asked by King (and I'm paraphrasing here), 'If you're as clean as you say you are, then why don't you go after each and every one of the doping authorities in court?' Lance then implied that he didn't want to go after them all because all that would do would be to prolong what's being said about him and give more attention to it, and would possibly drag on for years. After the clip, Soledope, who was outwardly defensive of Lance throughout the show, turned to Carol Costello and asked her if SHE would sue the authorities if they had done the same to her in a tone that suggested she didn't think that he should have to bother. Carol turned to Soledope and said something to the effect, "You bet I would go after them. If it meant clearing my name, I don't care how long it would take."

I think Carol makes a very good point, and I fully agree with her. If I was completely innocent and someone was tarnishing my reputation by accusing me of something I didn't do, I would do anything it took to clear my name, no matter how long it took. If Armstrong is as clean as he says, and I hope he is, I can't understand why he wouldn't go after them all in court for bringing up bogus accusations. If he knows he hasn't done anything wrong, what's he got to lose?

2) This one is kind of dumb, but I'll be damned if Lance Armstrong didn't have a similar sounding tone of voice and some very similar mannerisms in his speech as our distinguished president does when he's defending his own policies. Maybe it was just me, but in his denials, I thought Lance sounded hauntingly similar to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't watch it, but I saw some snippets on the Today show.
Two things struck me:

1. He seemed to have some plausible ways that the urine could have been contaminated.

2. Does anyone honestly believe that whatever this was that supposedly was found in his system from several years ago could have enabled him to win 7 tours?

It might cast a shadow of a doubt on his accomplishments, but I don't see how it diminishes them.

Even so, what are the odds that other tour riders, subjected to the same scrutiny, wouldn't have the same problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ahh, the trials and tribulations of a cheating, millionaire, jock.
Stealing Michael Jackson's spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalinNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Every year the French news goes after Lance, and every time
he tries to fight them. They are after him because they have taken their Precious Tour de France championship away from any Frenchman. (He basically said that in one of his books.)

It would cost him millions of dollars, plus precious time away from this cancer foundation to fight these guys. I don't blame him for not wanting to sue. But I feel he probably will have to in the end, if they don't come out and state HOW the tests where done, where or how the urine was stored and IF the person who preformed the tests is legitimate.

As a cancer survivor myself, I highly doubt Lance would take any drug(s) that could harm him in any way. (JMO!) - And he did state that last night on Larry King.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flagg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. They are after him because they have taken their Precious Tour de France c
Bul.

No Frenchman has been in a position to win the Tour for at least 15 years.
And the French loved Greg Lemon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. bullshit
Edited on Fri Aug-26-05 08:34 AM by bicentennial_baby
"They are after him because they have taken their Precious Tour de France championship away from any Frenchman."

Hmmmm, I don't recall the French press or the French people going after Miguel Indurain...and he's certainly not French....he won the Tour several times as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. But Indurain is not American.
And they didn't love LeMond too much the first time he won, either.

I read something recently, i think it was from Eddy, and he said that basically, the French Press loves a Loser. when you finally fall from your perch on top of the world, they will pick you up, hug you to their bosom and declare to the world "See??? He's HUMAN!!!"

Lance never gave them a chance to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. So if Lance said it, it must be true...
Edited on Fri Aug-26-05 10:38 AM by Hobarticus
Lance has many traits to be admired for, but he's just as much as pissy and petty as the French are over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lance already has several lawsuits on the stove.
He's suing the people who came out with the book "LA Confidential", I believe he has a suit against 2-3 former employees who claim they found "drug residue" in his room...
What do we expect him to do? Sue the whole fucking WORLD?

Hell, there's even more than a few here on DU that he'd have to sue for slander...

For an idea of what a man looks like when he becomes a "Litigation Machine", look at Fred Phelps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. It sounds like he has been advised by KKKROVE...IGNORE IT
and it will just go away. THAT'S THEIR WAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. if Lance sues, the Tour will take his victories away . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Did he say that? I'm not aware of that, so can you provide a link that
would explain why he'd lose his victories were he to sue? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. my comment is just conjecture, I just think it is unsportsmanlike to ...
sue the sports-association that awarded you their...
blue ribbon, yellow jersey, or whatever.

nobody likes being sued, and you have to fight back when sued,
{for disputed call in the game or elsewhere,}
or refs and umps will be spending all day in court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. I had pulled for Lance also
I didn't see the show but I'm starting to wonder about his possible doping. Each year I kept telling myself that he's stronger more determined, feels like he has something to prove ETC. What would be the odds of his having accomplished this so easily going so far as telling us a year in advance that he was going to win. YES, I will defend my good name as long as I have a breath to draw. And so yes his denial without teeth is lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. Come on...he is likely the most tested person on the face of the
Edited on Fri Aug-26-05 08:20 AM by Lochloosa
earth. The French are just pissed that no one could beat him. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbscott19 Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. Something wasn't right.
I saw the interview last night. And just let me say that I hope this is all proven false, BUT...five minutes into it, Lance had me completely convinced that he is lying through his teeth. His body language was screaming it. He also have that "arrogant" tone about him, like he knew it didn't matter what he said since he is retired. JMO though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yeah, from the clips I saw, I got similar vibes
I wish I had seen the entire show like you did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I have an idea!
Let's tie the guy hand and foot, and throw him in the river. If he's innocent of these doping allegations, then the water will accept him, and he'll sink.

If he's lieing, then the water will REJECT him, and he'll float.

Hope neither of you 2 are ever on a jury deciding MY fate....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Man, talk about getting dramatic
Last I knew this was a discussion forum, not a court room, so you don't need to go getting all radical just becasue some of us might have read something into it that you did or didn't. Lighten up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. what?
"Last I knew this was a discussion forum, not a court room, so you don't need to go getting all radical just becasue some of us might have read something into it that you did or didn't. Lighten up."


Oh, because YOU don't like what *I* bring to the discussion, I need to "lighten up"?

"Read" anything you want into it. I'll wait for FACTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. I watched it and I heard a bizzare collection of arguments.
1) Who does the media think they are by policing sports?
2) Doping charges were handled correctly by the Baseball league
(There is not a bicycle league that I am aware of)
3) Nobody supervised the tester
4) The test is flawed and not accurate

bla bla bla

I turned the channel because it sounded like bullshit.

I did not hear him say "I did not do it". I only heard wierd arguments attacking everything else while evading the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC