Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When are we going to start calling them warmongers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 02:00 AM
Original message
When are we going to start calling them warmongers?
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 02:20 AM by firefox
As in, it is us against those god damned warmongers.

I will have to do some searches and see how many times the NYT uses the word "warmonger." Betting on the first appearance of "warmonger" on the front page would make a great pool.

When will the NYT first print the quote "W is for warmonger?" This controlled media is unreal the way it deals in vocabulary. So from now on until WarCriminal gets his justice and we get some truth, the worst president ever becomes Warmonger Bu$h to me.

I am still amazed at Cindy Sheehan. Surely her truths have used warmonger followed by Bu$h. Maybe she had a few words in between, but she uses my type of vocabulary, as well as speak my mind on the criminals ruining the country.

Here is to Cindy and others against the criminal warmongers. They are taking on the biggest professional Warmongers. They get paychecks and retirement to prove they're professionals. Maybe we need some amateur criminal Warmongers to practice with. Remember they must be criminal Warmongers and not just the nutjob plebeian amateur Warmongers. Maybe we could find the amateurs a good institutions and find some way they could contribute positively to society.

I hate Warmongers, both professional and amateur. No offense to Warmongers International, but the US Warmongers union needs some busting as a matter of national security. Okay, global security too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think of them more as war profiteers
since their wars are primarily for their own profit and for everyone else's loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, war profiteers, that is what they are.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think we have too much fun with "chickenhawks"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friesianrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. I prefer chickenhawk murderers...
That is, after all, what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC