Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No More People Than At A Normal Bush Speech?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:14 PM
Original message
No More People Than At A Normal Bush Speech?
It would seem that Bush is able to bus more people in for a normal whistle-stop speech than turned out to support him in Crawford. I wonder if they were there to support the war and not the President? Do they see any difference? Either way it seems to have been a pathetic turnout in support of the Chimp and his war.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. the problem is that you guys are not 100 000 out there
fucking denial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I mean that the anti-war movement has to be a show of force
if the bushies can bus 4000, why can't the progressives bus 100 times that amount ?

making fun of their 4000, won't change the fact that they outnumber you 4 to 1

and be sure they are going to use it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbiit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. first off I bet your numbers are off
second of all, there are 10 million+ people surrounding Crawford, most of who voted for the Chimp. 3-4,000 freepers showing up is very lousy compared to all the the chimp support in the area.
tib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Could you be anymore insulting? Shows what you know about
'most' Texans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Those numbers are wrong


http://rds.yahoo.com/S=53720273/K=bush/v=2/SID=w/l=NSER/R=2/SIG=1347d0r2q/EXP=1125264307/*-http%3A//news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050827/pl_nm/iraq_usa_protest_dc_7

Cindy Sheehan, whose son Casey was killed in Iraq last year and has camped outside Bush's ranch seeking a second meeting with him to press for the withdrawal of troops, said her efforts would ultimately lead to the end of the war in Iraq.

"I know that the Camp Casey movement is going to end the war in Iraq," she said after folk singer Joan Baez led supporters in singing "Amazing Grace." Rally organizers estimated the crowd in the sweltering heat was more than 2,000, although it appeared smaller.

***

Across town in Crawford, other parents of soldiers who are serving or have died in Iraq countered Sheehan with their own raucous rally that started with a prayer.

Organizer Howard Kaloogian accused Sheehan of "giving hope and encouragement to our enemies."

The crowd, which organizers said topped 3,000 but appeared closer to 1,500, chanted "Cindy, Go Home" and compared her to Jane Fonda, whose visit to a North Vietnamese gun site in 1972 earned her the nickname "Hanoi Jane."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. it doesn't matter 1:2 or whatever
you won't win anything unless you OUTNUMBER

and that's all the way to the White House 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I guess you weren't in New York for the march last August
When we had had half a million marching past Madison Square Garden and hundreds of demonstrations all around town all week long.

Don't lecture me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Crawford is symbolic that's the difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. New York is symbolic - remember the Twin Towers?
They used to stand here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. ?????????????????????????????
what I mean is that the focus for change in the US has been this summer in Crawford. It showed for the FIRST time that it was "OK" to oppose the war, this for the broader masses...

that's why the show of force is so important. It cannnot be related to only ONE person, no matter how wonderful she is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. yes & I am telling you we had HALF A MILLION marching against the war -
and against Bush last summer in New York - we had our show of force - this is something different.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Bush's approval rating on how he is handling Iraq: 38%
We DO outnumber them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. You're accepting the 4,000 as actual fact?
Good for you. :eyes:

I'll wait for visual verification with some pictures, first. Now, having said that, here's the deal. There have been many thousands more to the Camps Casey over the past several weeks. We weren't the ones who needed to take 3 weeks to show up for all of one day. We've been there for THREE WEEKS. We'll be there when the wingnuts have gone home. And we'll be in DC on the 24th. They'll still be planning a 'rebuttal'.

You might factor that into your calculations while waiting for actual numbers to arrive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. that was the first figures I got
but it still doesn't matter

it was known that the bushies were to rally today. That's why a big effort should have been made to make them ridiculous

there is no shadow over the people of course having been there for weeks, they made history

but the MSM and the republican machine will picture the thing as at least an equal rapport of force

that's why they have to be outnumbered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. And how many were at the march in NYC for the RNC?
And how many hundreds of thousands less than that did the MSM report? Even with the evidence on tape right in front of us.

It doesn't matter how many we have. The numbers won't be reported correctly, anyway. If we outnumbered them 10:1, the numbers would be made to look even and, according to the latest reports out of the AP, that's what's being reported: even numbers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. it would have been very difficult to ignore a 10:1 TODAY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Doubt it. We had video and pictures in NYC. We have none today, yet.
So, which is it easier to lie about? Video and pictures SHOWING hundreds of thousands MORE protesters in NYC than reported or no pictures of the numbers of protesters in Crawford? I'm thinking the latter is easier to fudge, myself.

You might want to wait for updates before getting disappointed in something you can't even see. Maybe you should be disappointed, but maybe not. Why not wait a while?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. the momentum is in Crawford right now
and even if it's 1:1, it's still too little

I see it as a strategic question. What happened before was in a different context. Cindy is now planning a tour. The numbers are important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Different context, maybe. Same cause, definitely.
It's all cumulative. That's why the poll numbers for the cabal are dropping. NOT because of Crawford alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I agree with that
more people today had been a tactical victory, because of the focus.

look at that one :

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-08-27-crawford-protests_x.htm

(I have only access to weblinks, no TV live, except a video on Fox very biased but which couldn't show bigger crowds)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Yep, that's the AP story showing even numbers
What the story doesn't say is that the MAF protest was organzined by the wingnut PR group that brought us the Swiftboat Liars. Hardly a spontaneous, grassroots group.

Right now, the pictures being shown usually contain images of the freepers in downtown Crawford and images of Cindy juxtaposed with the smaller numbers of her supporters keeping vigil at Camp Casey I (the smaller, original camp). They are NOT showing the thousands at Camp Casey II who arrived by bus. They aren't showing the buses, either. **sigh** Check out the earlier threads for those. Many, many pictures of people arriving at Camp II. http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/images/bus/index.htm http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/images/buses2/index.htm http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/images/tent/index.htm http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/images/mfso/index.htm

Some pro-war pics included: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/images/prodeath/index.htm

It's very intense today. I think everyone needs time to sort the images and present a cohesive story of facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. to avoid the spin below
http://us.cnn.com/2005/US/08/27/crawford.rallies.ap/index.html

Cindy supporters should have been in much bigger numbers

they can lie but only to a certain level...

that was my point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I understand
But my point is that they could've had many times more Cindy supporters there and the news would reflect the exact same numbers they are reporting right now. They want to show a 50-50 split where there is none, so they'll invent one. There's no stopping the spin, I don't care how many more people showed up at Camp Casey.

Yes, they can lie, but there is no limit on the level. None. Sorry, but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. exactly. that's the real point, imho. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. march for women's lives 1.5 million. reported as "thousands."
they can, will, and DO LIE to any level suits their propaganda job.

this was not to convince the lying msm. we KNOW who owns them.


this amazing Truth movement just keeps growing.
that is what matters.

what is your problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. They do a good enough job of making themselves look ridiculous
We really don't have to do much at all.

Secondly, your numbers are off. Way off. The AP reported 1,000 Bushbots and 2,000+ Cindy supporters, other mothers of the fallen, Iraq vets, etc.

Finally, I think it's interesting that you keep referring to us as "you guys."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:25 PM
Original message
400 is closer
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Why aren't you out there?
The "you guys" statement just seems odd.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I live in Europe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conservativesux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:32 PM
Original message
Lucky you !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conservativesux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. self delete
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 04:33 PM by Conservativesux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Then your reply makes sense.
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. that's why the focus should be the pigmedia!
how many chicagoans, or atlantans, or new yorkers, or los angelonolians could be aroused to protest these city's fox'news' liars' treason and criminality? bush's crawford is too far away (and busheviks control the approaches; you can be sure stories start about cindy supporters being turned away will soon be common)
it's the pigmedia which is bush's ace in the hole....and it's the pigmedia which is a constant in the bush banana peel we stepped on in 2000 (on eve of 2k belection, most americans still thought geeb jr was geeb senior!)
that was because the pigmedia has sponsored geeb jr; it has always hated any true representative of popular will...
LET'S GET THEM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I agree completely
it must be a national movement

that's how the "regime changes" were done in Ukraine and other countries by peaceful means

the force is in organisation and numbers + some charismatic leaders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soup Bean Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. Well, there is no draft this time out.
Most people don't get upset until it hits them at home. I think Bush's falling numbers have more to do with gas prices rising than anything else, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Do you think that some were paid?
Legimate question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I"d be willing to bet they are either paid or rewarded
not that it matters.
They could amass 150,000, and it wouldn't make the cause "noble".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Hey lerkfish my friend how are you my brother.
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 04:53 PM by DanCa
Haven't seen you around the last two days. was worried :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. hey, I'm fine, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Consider this piece of trivia
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 05:30 PM by Lithos
We are talking the heart of Texas here, a state with a very large number of Republicans. Crawford is also about 1 hour drive from Ft. Hood, one of the largest Army bases in the US.

And all they can get is (maybe) 3,000 people to show up after a massive blitz? Most of those coming to Camp Casey in support are mostly Texas activists who are many weeks into their rotation and yet number as much if not more?

That is the real story. This is the heart of Bush country, yet he is performing so weakly.

L-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Makes ya wonder if bush really won Texas? If he did, looks like his
support might be dwindling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. He won the state
I don't doubt that, but I think there has been a strong erosion of his support since then.

L-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. I think he may have won the state, but the numbers were padded
Those padded numbers were then used to support the 'mandate' he claimed. They felt that Texas was a safe place to pad election totals. Not so, not anymore. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. yes.. 31 states 'won' x 110K 'extra' = 3.41 million mandate 'votes'
safe states could have had more than 110k, and "close" states made up the difference..a little here..a little there:(

phone mandate...phony president.. phony cowbay.. phony everything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. Oh I agree with you!
I know he took my county, Bexar, big time, but in 2000 we voted with paper and pen, in '04 it was electronic voting machines! Why the switch in a safe state? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
43.  sorry dupe
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 09:52 PM by SoCalDem
;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
44.  SAME 'busloads of people".. wandering aimlessly around the US
showing up wherever their "little coward from Crawford" wants them..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC