madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 10:17 PM
Original message |
|
tony`s little token of his un-dieing love for the texas stud http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/news/story/0,11711,1558137,00.html?gusrc=rssi wonder when george is going to give it back?
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. And for that he gets a cushy position with the Carlyle group |
|
Nice going Tony you POS lying war monger!
|
lvx35
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
2. HAHA! The bigger scandal is that its in the Oval office! |
|
The repukes love Churchill because they can't love FDR because he was a democrat. It shows their true colors so well: Their partisianship goes beyond their patriotism to the point where they would rather honor foreign leaders than great Democrats!
|
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Churchill would be livid n/t |
Taxloss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
IndyOp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The UK gov't will ask for it back after Tony |
|
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 10:24 PM by IndyOp
gets his new job with BIG US corporation (Carlyle).
|
Maple
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-27-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I found this part interesting |
|
"Until, that is, March 2001, when Blair's officials requested the President of the US should be loaned a bust of the British war-time premier.
George Bush, a fan of Churchill, who once described him as 'the best example of how individuals can shape history', now has sole use of the Epstein bust, despite the fact this sort of political or diplomatic presentation of GAC art is not sanctioned by founding principles drawn up in 1898."
Before 9/11.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |