blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-29-05 03:16 PM
Original message |
So freeps claimed Paula Jones not getting flowers was proof of unfair bias |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-29-05 03:50 PM by blm
against her by then Gov. Clinton.
They even thought the whole story warranted impeachment.
Gee, then they must REALLY be up in arms that Rumsfeld is getting rid of the whistleblower at the Army Corps of Engineers who ratted out the exaggerated billings and excessive contracts awarded to Halliburton.
Surely the freeps aren't even happy that billions of our tax dollars are going unaccounted for by cronies of the Bush White House.
Wouldn't ANY real patriot be alarmed at this turn of events?
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-29-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She had to get beat up by Tonya Harding in order to get money to pay her bills! At least she got a face lift out of "the deal" even if she had to "risk it" then!
|
Maccagirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-29-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That lawsuit was a perjury trap |
|
Unfortunately Paula couldn't keep her facts straight in her affidavit and her story couldn't pass muster with an anti-Clinton judge. Of course the media was more than happy to help as long as they could.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-29-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Our troops not getting flowers was a major Cheney obfuscation nt |
Spangle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-29-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Reading her testomny under Oath is sicking |
|
When you realize how far that case went. She wasn't expecting to discuss her claims. Just about Clinton.
She claimed Clinton kept her from recieving flowers on secatary Day, But when questioned under oath.. She admited she wasn't a secatary and didn't KNOW if other "non-secatarys" did or did not recieve flowers.
She claimed He prevented her from getting pay raises. But she recieved several, couldn't state much about it. Wither it was normal, etc.... She wasn't "prepped" on this issue at all.
Claimed he prevented her from getting a advancement at the work place.... she admited that she didn't eve APPLY FOR ONE.
She had NO case.
The hoopla was over what she said was his MOTIVATION for why he prevented her from getting flowers/ prevented pay raises/ prevented job promotions, etc.
She was ready to speak about the motivation, because that is all that the media questioned her about. She acted like she was suprised that the defense was questioning her about pay raises, job promotions, etc. She couldn't answer the questions, she wasn't prepared to answer them.
The defense pretty much showed that her case was full of AIR. But the media never reported THAT.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |