Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP - Froomkin: Bush's Second Great Challenge (Hurricane Katrina)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:50 AM
Original message
WP - Froomkin: Bush's Second Great Challenge (Hurricane Katrina)
Edited on Wed Aug-31-05 10:51 AM by sabra

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/08/31/BL2005083101127.html

Bush's Second Great Challenge

By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com

As the enormity of the disaster along the Gulf Coast slowly comes into focus, President Bush breaks off his vacation to return to Washington today and confront what may be the second great challenge of his presidency.

Bush is unlikely to act as divisively as he did after the first, when he responded to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks by invading first Afghanistan and then Iraq. But he already faces tough questions about his slow response to Hurricane Katrina and the relative lack of federal preparation.


Critics and supporters alike agree that in the coming days and weeks, Bush and his aides will be grappling with defining decisions and a test of his leadership.

Among the questions being asked around Washington and the blogosphere this morning:

* If the reason Bush returned to Washington is that he is more effective here, then why didn't he come back two days ago?

* If the White House considers the return from vacation largely symbolic, then what is the symbolism of his long vacation during a war?

* Could Bush and the federal government have done more to prepare for hurricane recovery? Unlike the Asian tsunami, this hurricane was forecast days ahead of time.

* Did any of his previous budget decisions allow the hurricane to cause more damage than it might have otherwise?

* Are National Guard troops and equipment required to restore order in this country many thousands of miles away.

* Will he and his administration meet this disaster quickly and effective with the appropriate civilian and military resources and manpower?

* Will the White House provide the bold leadership and vision that the nation requires?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thedailyshow Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope reporters will ask those questions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. SECOND? He never stepped up to the FIRST ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush Declares War On Poseidon
Begins preparation for an invasion of Atlantis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. lol
My favorite post so far today.

Thanks for the chuckle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Halfway through the war in Atlantis, he attacks the Isle of Lesbos instead
When asked (one year after the fact) why we attacked Lesbos while Poseidon was allowed to flee Atlantis, White House Spokesman Scott McClellan was quoted as having said, "8/30! 8/30! Questions like that allow the Hurricans to win. . . huh huh huh huh. Lesbos."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. He needed to add:
* Will the devastation produced by this mega-storm be enough to get the nitwit to admit global warming is real and requires an immediate and bold plan that actually does something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. The answer to the last question:
Will the White House provide the bold leadership and vision that the nation requires?

Is No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Freudian slip?
"Bush is unlikely to act as divisively as he did after the first"
Did he mean divisively or decisively? Personally, I thought he was divisive but I'm not sure the writer thinks that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC