txaslftist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 10:31 AM
Original message |
Yesterday's stealth R/W talking point... |
|
...some asshat substituting in for Michael Reagan (you know him, the former president's adopted son Mike? Yeah. Ron Reagan's son. He's the one who has Ron Reagan for a dad. In case you missed it, he's the "legacy" of Ron Reagan. He'll tell you who he is, he's Ron Reagan's son, Michael. Yep.)
Anyway, Michael Reagan has a radio show and had some asshat subbing in for him (not sure who the asshat was, but he was NOT the son of a former president, no sir) who said, "The US needs to just get out of South Korea." on account of the fact that the South Koreans are ungrateful to us for saving them from the perils of communism and if it weren't for us, they'd be "picking kernels of rice off of the ground". The South Koreans are apparently wanting to remove the 15' bronze statue of McCarthur that graces their benighted land because to them it represents "occupation".
He was pitching this notion of removing all US military from So. Korea and how it will save us money, and how they should be able to take care of themselves and if they can't, tough shit, they're asking for it and blah blah blah.
Since these schills all basically get their marching orders from the Powers That Be, I wonder if this is some new WH initiative we're seeing test-flown, kinda like the assassination of Hugo Chavez...
Whattaya think, DUers? Is this just the asshat talking, or are we really going to leave So Korea?
|
BillZBubb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Neo-cons don't leave foreign countries in Asia |
|
Part of PNAC is to militarily encircle China. You can't do that if you leave Korea.
|
txaslftist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. You're probably right. I shouldn't assume every stupid thing... |
|
...they say is part of a larger plot. Sometimes they are just stupid.
|
Brother Buzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
3. We're not leaving, only the infantry is being pulled |
|
Front line infantry troops have become moot and have mostly been replaced with higher technology positioned further back from the DMZ. I understand the change helped free up a couple of Brigades of soldiers for deployment to Iraq.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Two great benefits to leaving S. Korea: |
|
1) It frees up 30,000 troops for the shooting war; 2) It makes it necessary to nuke N Korea when they try to take advantage of the 'tripwire' being gone.
Rummie really wants to try out his little battlefield nukes and bunker busters.
|
txaslftist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. How cynical. How probable. How frightening. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |