lateo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:47 PM
Original message |
Folks...we hit the trifecta. |
|
We already knew the Scooter Libby and Cheney were more than likely involved in the Plame leak and now it looks like Bush just might be too...
TRIFECTA!
|
Ladyhawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. So far only rumors of rumors, but at least they're "mainstream" rumors. :D |
shaggy1974
(66 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There's just as good of a chance that there won't be indictments. I hope I'm wrong, but it's quite possible that Fitzgerald doesn't have enough for criminal indictments...and if he doesn't it doesn't just mean that he's in the pocket of Bushco.
|
stepnw1f
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 06:50 PM by stepnw1f
|
DoYouEverWonder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
You don't get a panel of judges to agree to send a Pulizer prize winning journalist to jail unless you've got a case.
It not a matter of if there will be indictments, it's just how many and when.
|
snippy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. Read Judge Tatel's opinion in the Cooper/Miller case. |
|
Fitzgerald's evidence seems to have convinced Judge Tatel that crimes were committed.
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. people that make these kind of statements |
|
haven't been following this story. Did you forget about the statements made by the judge before remanding Miller to jail?
|
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
mcctatas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
6. If there is any justice in this world, these thugs will finally have to |
|
practice some of that "personal accountability" they're always harping about (usually as a reason to cut social programs or otherwise screw the poor and middle-class), don't let lurkers and freepers get ya down, just toss them a scooby snack;)
|
henslee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It just as good if he is the last man standing. |
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
8. No. Saying Bush was involved is meant to make it look good when |
|
fitz just comes out with a report slamming the WH or with a few indictments for aides.
Freepers will be so happy - they will give Bush a big blue sticky star for not being a felon.
I'm guessing of course. Don't think there has been one leak from Fitz office - so why all of sudden?
I don't buy it.
Let's just wait for the facts written down on paper & filed with the courts.
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
17. No leaks out of Fitz's camp.. |
|
so we have to assume it is from people who have testified or who know who testified to what.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Assume is right. I would bet it isn't true. |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. You could be right...you could be wrong |
|
I was just stating the obvious source, from my perspective, of the leak. Could be disinfo. We shouldn't have too much longer to wait to find out.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Yup - as I've always said - we don't know until we know. We are not |
|
witness. We have to rely on primary info of others.
|
henslee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message |
9. What is a realistic time frame for stuff to get rolling? |
snippy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. The term of the grand jury expires October 28. |
|
So some of the criminals in the Bush administration should have their orange jumpsuits in time for Halloween.
|
DesertRat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Welcome President Hastert? |
snippy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Bush would never resign. |
|
And there is no crime for which a republican controlled House would impeach him. No crime whatsoever.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message |