Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More NewsMax fun - Rush Limbaugh: Miers Pick 'Disappointing'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:20 PM
Original message
More NewsMax fun - Rush Limbaugh: Miers Pick 'Disappointing'

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/10/3/134610.shtml

Rush Limbaugh: Miers Pick 'Disappointing'

Rush Limbaugh Unhappy with Miers

Rush Limbaugh is none too happy about President Bush’s nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, saying it’s a selection "made from weakness.”

"There was an opportunity here to show strength and confidence, and I don’t think this is it,” Rush told listeners of his show, America’s most widely heard talk radio program.

"It seems to me from the outset that this is a pick that was made from weakness.

"There are plenty of known quantities out there who would be superb for the Court. This is a nominee that we don’t know anything about. It makes her less of a target, but also doesn’t show a position of strength.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn, I'm shocked Shrub didn't pick his mother
or Bill Bennett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who cares what Oxyanalcyst Rush thinks anyway.
He could be decoying like everyone else is - I'm just not into believing anything he says - EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. He did pick his maid though.
Didn't he?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neocondriac Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rush was hoping for...
a pasty white, impotent , oxy contin popping fvck like himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Meanwhile WSJ implies Miers anti-abortion and a Scalia "originalist"
So is Ms. Miers's not just a judicial restraint/limited role of the court/judicial conservative, she is a Scalia anti-abortion "orginalist" with no respect for precedent?

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB1128351923853585...

<snip>Marvin Olasky, a journalism professor and the father of the "compassionate conservative" movement, posted a series of excerpts from interviews with friends and acquaintances of Harriet Miers he conducted before the official nomination. One of the interviews was with Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht, who said he has known Ms. Miers for 30 years and described their relationship as "very close friends."

Quoting Mr. Hecht on Ms. Miers's judicial philosophy: "She's an originalist -- that's the way she takes the Bible," and that's her approach to the Constitution as well -- "Originalist -- it means what it says."

Mr. Hecht says he and Ms. Miers "went to two or three pro-life dinners in the late 80s or early 90s."<snip>


http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa022701a.htm
Scalia on the Constitution


U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia explained and defended his "originalist" approach to constitutional interpretation in a closing address to a Princeton University conference on James Madison, fourth president and framer of the Constitution.

Speaking on Feb. 23, 2001, Justice Scalia explained that he, like Madison, interprets the Constitution according to the "common sense" meaning and definition of the document's words at the time they were written. An opposite approach, Scalia suggested from that applied by Justices who believe the Constitution "changes from age to age in order to meet the needs of a changing society."

Scalia criticized the second approach, saying that it too often results in crafting subjective interpretations of the Constitution to address issues that could and should be handled by Congress.

Calling his view of the Constitution an "originalist" view, Scalia conceded it often places him in a position of supporting laws that do not seem to make sense.

"It may well be stupid, but if it's stupid, pass a law!" he said. "Don't think the originalist interpretation constrains you. To the contrary. My Constitution is a very flexible Constitution. You want a right to abortion? Create it the way all rights are created in a democracy, pass a law. The death penalty? Pass a law. That's flexibility

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pompano Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. yep...
Lush Limpballs won’t be happy until the Supremes include, Jerry Falwell, Pat “diamond mines” Robertson, Jimmy “hotels NOLA” Swaggart and some DA extremly sympathetic to oxycontin abuse, doctor shopping, by the rich and famous.

you know, the party of family values...no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. But, but...she goes to church every Sunday and
works late into the night. The MSM said so. Single, right? So no whiny spouse or kids wondering when she'll be home to cook dinner. You can bet the ilk of Rush and the rest will pounce on that one:"M-m-m-m, not married eh...something must be wrong with her".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ken_g Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. The way Bush has been acting, I thought for sure he would
appoint a horse like Caligula did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Isn't this all just a bit too coordinated?
Honestly, if OXY Rush were somehow "surprised" by the announcement of Miers don't you think he would be just a little less inclinced to IMMEDIATELY attack the BushCo. choice? I believe that if he were truly surprised by the announcement he would have soft shoed it today about the nomination. Has OXY Boy ever given you a reason to believe that he is not fully in league with BushCo.? I would venture to say that OXY Boy is a central player in BushCo., he is not uninformed and his lightning quick panning of Miers is highly suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC