Cush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-08-03 11:36 AM
Original message |
|
Not that they will read it on air, but
It was hard for Arnold to lose when the news networks all but endorsed him. As I watched over the last week or so, I wondered if I was watching the news or one big campaign ad for Arnold. Three times in a row now (2000, 2002, 2003) where the press has given the Republican candidate(s) a free pass, while hammering the Democrats at every turn. CNN, I must say I'm disappointed. I thought you were better than FOX and MSNBC
**** ***, VA
Yeah, I was a little too polite, but honestly....CNN is better than the other two.
Lol, a caller just said this is more evidence that people vote for image and not with their brains.
|
Cush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-08-03 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
1. This one guy is making sense |
|
Matt Miller says that Arnold really could create more problems more problems for Bush. If he governs as a moderate (fat chance) then republicans will turn against him. If he governs like Bush, then it will create more opposition to Bush
|
morgan2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-08-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
2. msnbc was better than cnn |
|
msnbc had much better coverage of the recall than cnn. Everything on cnn was about Arnold being good and Davis being bad except the Larry King interview with Davis. Everytime Arnold was shown was with cheering and adoring crowds, Davis was always talked about as why he failed. MSNBC was better about it, especially on the day before and of the vote.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |