|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:43 PM Original message |
Lawrence: at least three indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. So are these the reasons for Bush's Harriet Miers nomination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. oh but of course.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I thought she couldn't do anything, but recuse herself??? no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. That's right isn't it? Does the Law require that she recuse herself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmkinsey (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I believe that it's at the discretion of the individual SC Justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. She would need to examine heself and decide if she were under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Oh, That!! makes me feel better! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. "He discovered he was incorruptible" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indie_voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. I guess this means no indictments today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samdogmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I hope the unindicted co-conspirators are Bush & Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I thought the Veep can be indicted outright? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Someone who wouldn't be subject to a trial while in office I am guessing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indie_voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. A dream come true!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
7. Cheney - Very high level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Bolton isn't/wasn't part of the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cry baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Maybe even the shrub himself...? Dare I hope? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whometense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. Any lawyers here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Not a lawyer, but such an accusation would be libel if not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whometense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
35. Or he isn't able to be indicted because of his office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. Not much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. All rumor at this point. Fitzgerald runs a tight ship. Give him time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
15. Probably Libby and other expendables/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Re: turning of those "western Aspens?" Did Libby mean Cheney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
16. edit thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
18. Note this part: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
25. 11th hour testimony... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. just heard this on MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Flipping Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. The Fed. Prosecutor WOULD NOT GUARANTEE NO INDICTMENT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LunaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 04:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Rove will dig himself deeper with new testimony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
28. Someone suggested Rove's going to rat out Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. O'Donnells prediction: what does this mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. "unindicted" indicates Bush, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 06:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. But "unindicted co-conspirator" is a good step toward impeachment. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-06-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. That's my reading... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC