leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:13 PM
Original message |
Andrea Mitchell is Shilling for bushco** on Hardball |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 04:16 PM by leftchick
"I don't believe anyone in the WH had any idea about the statute at the time of the leak"!!!
Good whoring there GE Andrea!!!
:puke:
|
July
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. |
|
At least, not for the rest of us.
|
Buddyblazon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
30. DING DING DING!!! WINNER! IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AND EXCUSE! |
|
Mitchells talking point is the easiest to shoot down...in burning flames in fact.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
33. Especially if you're sworn to uphold ALL the LAWS. |
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Gimme a fucking break.... |
|
She was on Real Time with Bill Maher a few weeks back, spewing the same Lt-AWOL apologist bullshit...
Mrs Greenspan should just sit down and STFU....
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Problem is...they are TOO LATE!!! |
|
TS, Andrea. Bad move. Now there is NO question regarding your allegiance.
:grr:
|
Ksec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I cant believe anyone WOULD NOt know about it.
|
Journeyman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
22. From my admittedly limited involvement with military security. . . |
|
I learned one important point guaranteed to keep me out of trouble: If someone didn't have a "need to know," I didn't tell them anything. What "need" does a journalist have for the identity of anyone in the CIA who isn't already in the public eye?
Here's a case from my own experience: I wouldn't tell anyone when or even if the trash was collected from my duty station. And if as a lowly sergeant I recognized the importance of such a seemingly trivial matter, why couldn't people in the White House sanctum sanctorum known when to STFU.
|
Missy M
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
5. She is one woman I can't stomach, everytime I see or hear her..... |
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I'm sorry to have to do this to you, |
|
but, since it sometimes crosses my mind, causing me boundless agitation, I will try to exorcise it by passing it on to you:
Andrea Mitchell and Alan Greenspan having sex.
There.
I feel lighter already .................... :woohoo:
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. okay I knew that but... |
|
:puke: thanks for the visual! :puke:
|
SillyGoose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Thank you for helping me adhere to my diet. That visual just wiped |
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. that is a brain teaser, isn't it? |
|
I mean, um, how?? :shrug:
|
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
"Andrea, honey? I'm taking the blue pills in a little while."
Andrea, thinking to herself, "The things I do for my network............"
|
Missy M
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
18. Thanks a lot!!!! I just lost my appetite right before dinner so I guess.. |
colbushwhacker_2000
(161 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
......horrible images flashing before me..........
|
anitar1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
38. Bag over his head? n/t |
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
|
he's a three-bagger, for sure.
HAHAHAHA!
Naughty, naughty......
|
La Coliniere
(581 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
40. Thanks for passing the YUK! |
|
Out of all the media hos, it is Mrs. Greenspan whom I despise the most. And believe me, I despise all of them. From Rita to Paula, from Greta to Michelle, from Ms. Crowley to Parshall, its Andrea who takes the prize for mendacity and fake importance.
|
SillyGoose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Ok, I'm glad someone else heard that besides me! |
|
How can she say that with a straight face?
:wow:
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. Blatant White House Propaganda right outa Her Piehole!!! |
SillyGoose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. I cannot believe she actually floated that one out there. |
|
How stupid does she think we all are??
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Andrea, you are full of shit. You are not credible as long as you shill |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 04:19 PM by Ilsa
for the Chimperor.
I heard her say that as if she thought a judge would buy it because she's such a great actress. Yeah, right.
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
catapulting the propanda....again.
I wonder how many Amerikans know that she is Mrs. Greenspa(m).
|
skylarmae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
9. its their responsibility to know - just more f**king excuses! |
|
She's a pig. Always was and always will be....
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
11. as long as she knows the law doesn't care if they knew or not |
|
it's still a crime and pleading ignorance ain't butter the biscuit this time.
|
medeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
16. "Unlikely he won't indict" |
|
See... Andrea's not all bad.
|
dave29
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
17. ignorance and arrogance |
|
turning with the aspens like the turdblossoms of my mind
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Andrea Mitchell the morning of June 15 on MSNBC |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 04:24 PM by seemslikeadream
Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC Wednesday June 15 You would have had to be brain dead not to know what the president was up too.
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
27. I'm sorry...what was that quote in reference too? |
|
Oh, and btw...that is one scary photo....Yikes!
|
DefenseLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |
21. And I don't believe anyone knew |
|
that that whole "under oath" deal before the grand jury was serious. I mean honestly. As if!
|
democrat in Tallahassee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message |
25. she was in on the "clinton trashing the white house" story, too |
|
She was counting the silver ware and glasses on air force 1. She is a pure whore.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
26. So, the most senior LAW ENFORCEMENT office doesn't know the law? |
|
Criminality is always a mixture of incompetence, ignorance, and immorality. Add insanity and it describes this cabal to a "T".
|
katty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Andrea is a big repub-wears her journalistic bias like a badge |
GeorgeGist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
(fill in your own blank)_____________________________________. The RIGHT theory for everything that you turn to sh*t.
|
EvolveOrConvolve
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If a person commits murder, can they get off by claiming they "didn't know about the homicide statutes?"
Who the hell does this clown think she's fooling?
Hey Andrea, why don't you do us all a favor and shut the fuck up! :argh:
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |
34. So let me get this straight... |
|
The White House was unaware of the statutes...
The White House has employed within it dozens of lawyers...
The chief lawyer (not including the entire Justice Department) is the White House Counsel, who apparently failed in their duty to be knowledgeable about the law OR failed to inform staff members.
Said Counsel is now the nominee for the Supreme Court.
So, either we people who KNOWINGLY BROKE THE LAW or WE HAVE NOMINATED AN INCOMPETENT TO THE SUPREME COURT.
So, Andrea, which is it?
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
36. No, Counsel at the time is the current Attorney general |
|
Only the highest law enforcement officer in the land...:rofl:
Unaware of the statute! BWAHAHAHAHAHA...tell me a new one, Andrea...:rofl:
|
Mr_Spock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
37. ... and this is news?? |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message |
41. I hate her. She's such a bush bot. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |