Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miller Admits Fabricating Hill Staffer Source to Protect Libby

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:20 PM
Original message
Miller Admits Fabricating Hill Staffer Source to Protect Libby
(This is a day old, but I haven't seen it discussed on DU.)

Judy Miller just admitted her deliberately deceptive role in the White House smear campaign against Joe Wilson.

Her New York Times “personal account” explains that her articles usually referred to Libby as a “senior administration official,” since it’s the truth. But when Libby gave her information about Wilson, the truth wouldn’t cut it.

So at Libby’s request, she agreed to deliberately deceive her readers by describing him as a “former Hill staffer.” The scheme was absurdly misleading, as Arianna explained. It helped Libby trash Wilson without implicating the White House. In Miller’s words, “Mr. Libby did not want the White House to be seen as attacking Mr. Wilson.”

This misleading sourcing violates the New York Times official guidelines, a key fact the Times article ignored. The newspaper requires reporters explain anonymous sourcing arrangements without being “coy,” and “especially when we can shed light on the source’s reasons” (emphasis added). Can you imagine how that might read?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ari-melber/miller-admits-fabricating_b_9005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Miller was clearly the Propaganda Mistress for the White House.
Printing what they directed, and then shielding them from any responsibility.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. As a glorified whore, shouldn't her title be "Propaganda MADAM" ?
Sorry to nit-pick, but Condi might get
pissed at your use of "mistress"!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. She was complicit from the beginning. This was no ordinary
objective journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oregonindy Donating Member (790 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. the more I hear the worse miller sounds......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Her Attorneys snookered Fitz.
She isn't all that bright but her Attorneys are. She is smack in the middle of the cabal of the Neo Fascists and was and is a willing tool for their agenda. Her past is catching up to her and her heroin status is crumbeling. Her pixie smile while going off to jail showed what she is about more than anything that she has said. She has been playing her game as a Media Star but as with most that catapult themselves in the the Bright Limelight there are those that work persistently to knock off anyone that stands on a pedestal of self agrandizement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Bush administration's Tokyo Rose... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. considering her career,
she MUST have been paid to do these dirty deeds. and by now realize she is responsible for thousands of deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Frau(lin) Goebbels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. And this woman has a Pulitzer.
And the New York Times is considered the finest paper in the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. i'm going to look through her old articles in the run up to the war
and see how many times "A former hill staffer" comes up in regards to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC